The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Ep. 204
The Nazi mythology, the so-called “Myth of the Blood,” refused the idea of a static, “monist” world, one built on a single thesis, one morality, and one unchanging God. Instead, it favored polarization and dynamism as the fundamental Law of Nature. This fact is clearly laid out and explained in Alfred Rosenberg’s 1930 word The Myth of the Twentieth Century, which serves as the basis for this series, The Myth of the Blood, on the New Discourses Podcast. In this episode of the podcast, host James Lindsay takes you through the last sections of the first chapter of Rosenberg’s Myth (titled “Race and Race-Soul”) to illustrate the complete Nazi rejection of monotheism, Catholicism, Christianity, Judaism, and any “static” concept of the world that isn’t based in race that honors and worships a living revelation in a dynamic, changing world ruled by a solar deity, which he locates in the Nordic Aryans from Atlantis. Join him to see what the Nazis really believed.
Volume 1: Pseudo-Traditionalism and the Nordic Science
Volume 3: Love as the Enemy of Race and Honor
Subscribe to the New Discourses Podcast on SoundCloud, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, YouTube, Rumble, Odysee, or by RSS.
Additional episodes of the New Discourses Podcast are available here.
1 comment
The “living,” dare I say ‘living, breathing’ revelation equates to the Liberal Higher Critic’s [outlined in Josh McDowell’s ‘Evidence That Demands A Verdict’s (two volume set)], assertion of their being imbued with a superior verstehen that justifies and demands their rewriting Scripture based upon their more illuminated, (both spiritually and intellectually), minds. (Read gnostic enlightenment as that is exactly what they propose in not so many words)
These self-appointed, self-adulating, self-aggrandizing, self-important “brite”-ly illuminated Community Organizers never offer to share why it is the rest of us should adhere to their dictates, their pronouncements as to what is good and what is evil.
Then, as Bastiat noticed, they always reflexively turn to the law to legislate their dictates…, to codify their dictates as doctrines and as law.