OnlySubs with James Lindsay, Episode 135
This episode is available exclusively for New Discourses contributors on the following platforms:
Facebook
Locals
Odysee
Patreon
Subscribestar
Substack
YouTube Members
What we now call Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) training in virtually any format, including “cultural competence” and “unconscious bias” trainings, derive from an earlier program more simply known as “Sensitivity Training.” Well, in 1974, the CIA published an internal memo about whether or not Sensitivity Training (or “Encounter Group” training) is appropriate for the agency, and they determined that it is not. The reasons are really something too: it creates groupthink, destroys independent thought, may not produce real (only false or apparent) results, and appears to be similar to thought-reform and brainwashing programs in Mao Zedong’s Communist China! Join me in this episode of James Lindsay OnlySubs, my subscribers-only podcast, to hear all about it.
Additional episodes of the OnlySubs Podcast can be found here.
6 comments
Quote – Also possibly see the wikipedia page on “sexual mimicry” – Unquote
Quite right yes theres always been an element among certain creatures where they can mimic to evolutionary advantage. Extraordinary is the sneaking in of claims which resemble discussions like that of a human like sex change, except among creatures. In reality such transitioning or birds in drag is not part of nature. On the contrary many of these claims are erroneous // postmodernist & political & have used fake entries into common sources.
We’ve seen a string of plagiarist harvardians at the top of the academic outrage charts. The queering of fish and birds with fake biological data nowhere near scales those heights.
The more I think about it, the more I view DEI and such things as the extreme form of “toxic femininity”.
Lying, manipulating, working as a group to ostracize others, painting others to be the bad guy when it’s really the opposite, guilt-tripping, etc., etc., etc.
Perhaps it’s no wonder this stuff comes from and/or blossoms at universities where several “social studies” might attract and sustain a disproportionate amount of women and certain types of men (e.g. look up “sneaker males” in fish, or characteristics of psychopathy).
Quote “sneaker males” in fish, Unquote.
There doesn’t seem to be any evidence or actual specimens. As a story it sure is gay & fantastique enough to fan the flames of todays WOKE though. Its clever too since even showing a fish body will not show us if its simply a female, since we’d need to look at its organs. Have they illustrated that ? No – theres no evidence of a male fish with a female exterior, nor bird, nor mammal etc. Your point is far more ‘evolved’ than their study in fact, where it IS valid and interesting, i.e in the way it seeks to understand an evolutional advantage for ‘sneaking’. << In itself remaining a useful way to refer to the political sissy factor going on out there.
Quote ''characteristics of psychopathy '' Unquote
Indeed – since as much as there are pathetic efforts to co-opt in a nu post-modernist style
digital biological script the matters are clearly pathological in some way. 'WOKE' in the way it was engineered to cause disruption whilst politicians carry out dirty deeds is only typical. Just another sociological cold war & artificially induced political struggle. However in most senses it is not simple as simple to pin on where or with whom the pathology is. It makers for example are not deranged, or mentally over its application as a strategy because it works. < They would be 'pathological' due to the way they need a further 20 billion. The little ordinary person in the street WOKE is even less obviously 'tapped'. They take part in a group consciousness psychosis & are not usually certifiably unhinged as individuals.
It could be argued that its easier to appear to be potty by insisting the cabalists are Left or Right when they clearly work as centrist / concentric circles. For consider – how did 'they' keep up the left / right erroneous belief ( among us ) so long ? Via a cultivation of group psychosis ofc & thus doing WOKE in exactly the same manner should be easy for all of us to understand.
Unless we failed to observe the older and most basic mass consciousness scams that is.
You can find many examples of websites mentioning this “sneaker males” phenomenon in fish. Many fish species have a clear difference between males and females with regards to their outside appearance. For instance, if I look to my left at my tropical freshwater aquarium as I am writing this, I can for instance see my little “Corydoras Habrosus” catfish where the females are much larger and fatter than the males are. To name just one example.
Also possibly see the wikipedia page on “sexual mimicry” concerning “sneaker males” where the following can be read for instance:
“A second type of males, the sneaker males, is parasitic and resembles the female bleniid fish in their small size, colour, and movement patterns. This allows them to intrude into the nest guarded by the parental males. Sneaker males approach the nests with the same colour patterns and movements that the females hold. “
Just call it Cultural Marxism or communism.
Quote – Just call it Cultural Marxism or communism – Unquote.
Good point & one that naturally leads us to ask how did the Marxism obtain its culture – REALLY.
It takes a great deal of manipulation & we get a glimpse via the efforts of Logan Lancing & James Lindsay . They show us that a great many follow them & frequently emit the words Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you. I some ways such persons have reason to be grateful.
In others not since both of them are repeating 1960’s CIA docs!
Like that Cultural Marxism in america is whatever the CIA said it was long ago.