New Discourses Bullets, Ep. 88
Compliance can be extracted by tyrants from a population through a straightforward method of creating enmity between segments of the population. First, the population is split into those who comply with the tyrant’s programs and policies and those who do not comply. If there are enough among the compliant, a demonization campaign we should call “hatecraft” is employed to pressure those dragging their feet to comply and to demonize those who refuse compliance. Perhaps no one in history was more skilled at these techniques, the politics of compliance, than Mao Zedong in CCP-controlled China. In this episode of New Discourses Bullets, host James Lindsay breaks down the politics of compliance in detail, exposing the malicious tool behind exactly what we have been put through over the last several years. Join him to understand this powerful weapon in the hands of tyrants and how to resist it.
Additional episodes of New Discourses Bullets can be found here.
Subscribe to New Discourses Bullets on SoundCloud, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, Pandora, YouTube, Rumble, Odysee or by RSS.
9 comments
This is off topic but I think it is vitally important. Something to chew on and not act on immediately. Basically, there is a pattern of attacking a thing’s strength that I have noticed in many of the attacks on existing structures but I’ve never heard anyone talk about it.
A general example is a bear. It’s sense of smell is incredible. Like 7 times that of a dog. They can smell things through a car’s body and will tear a car apart to get a snickers bar. With this strength of smell comes an inherent weakness and this is why pepper spray is such a great deterrent for bear attacks. The pepper spray affects them like 100 or 1000 times more than a human. Attack their strength.
I have noticed that leftist attacks focus on weaponizing freedom. Freedom of speech, sexual expression, movement, national identity, etc… They can use freedom of speech to attack freedom of speech, they can use freedom of sexual expression to attack family structures, freedom of movement to attack national borders, etc… The great strength of the west, freedom, is also its weakness.
The political left’s primary strength is their sense of justice and equality. They have used this to destabilize many, if not all, institutions of the West. They can make everything about race, gender, sexuality and frame it so these are all matters of justice. They have used this very effectively but…the sense of Justice is their strength but also their weakness. How we can take advantage of this is to pit the various factions of the left against each other. At every possible opportunity, pit their contradictory views against each other. Islam, vs open sexuality. Islamophobia vs anti-semitism. Corporatism vs Independent business(this one has turned raw milk drinkers into right-wing conspiracy theorists). High achieving minority vs low achieving minority. Experimental family/sexuality or state family vs more traditional immigrant family and community structures. These are just off the top of my head.
I really think this is the way to break them down. Their breakdown would naturally occur after they have collapsed the current systems but it can be triggered now, especially as the factions are vying over power that the left is gaining.
I’m not sure yet what to imply / could possibly describe the metaphysics of soft tyranny such as we see going on with people like Dawkins / Grayling / Penrose. They’ve all appear to have a special licence granted @ establishment level that gives them an immunity, or special ‘force field’ in which they can make the most outlandish excuses in order to bypass logical obstacles & proceed with their metaphysical ideas. WE ALL in the meantime assume they are austere empirical scientists, loaded to the gunnels with a track record of obtaining lab grade PROOF ( so much is the constant bleating to that effect by them ) – when actually just a cursory exam of these fucking state sponsored metaphysical twits reveals theres ZERO !! They people have NEVER obtained one shred of lab proof for anything in their lives & its all bollocks that they’ve obtained special permission ( and funding ) to Publish.
Take this silly Penrose Logic :
Penrose–Lucas argument
Logician Kurt Gödel
In 1931, mathematician and logician Kurt Gödel proved that any effectively generated theory capable of proving basic arithmetic cannot be both consistent and complete. In other words, a
mathematically sound theory lacks the means to prove itself.[17] However, in his first book on consciousness, The Emperor’s New Mind (1989), Roger Penrose argued that Gödel-unprovable results are provable by human mathematicians.[18] He takes this disparity to mean that human mathematicians are not describable as formal proof systems, and are therefore running a non-computable algorithm.
Godel meant that Mathematics in the hands of Humanity can never be observed in ‘completeness’. Another way of putting that is that the phenomenon of mathematics, with respect to the way more and more new expressions of it can be continuous. Hence this means that there are just too much mathematics by FAR for humans to handle IF human intend to search for the end of it – I.E a state where its been entirely observed AND THUS KNOWN. Godel doesn’t attempt to state this is since it goes on ‘forever’, just that its clear that theres so much of it that humanity could never reach any point of total observation.
ITS TOO HUGE.
Along comes silly metaphysical theory of everything Penrose. A mad man whose convinced his mind can overcome the problems involved in these stupendously sized time and space obstacles .. In a now familiar tradition as it happens as it seems all these maniacs are at it with psychic powers. But its like PENROSE decides – ‘ok i’ll really take the fucking piss here’ – i won’t even bother to understand Godel’ So Penrose turns his back on what Godel said by ignoring the specific ‘disabled aids available’ ( computers that would crunch numbers fast in this instance ) – insisting that a HUMAN must do it because ? ;
”Roger Penrose argued that Gödel-unprovable results are provable by human mathematicians”
Oh fucking hell NOOOOOOO Penrose !!!!! Godel found the matter ‘Unprovable’ given no form of closure boundary conditions could be imposed on Mathematics in order to see. thus calculate it ALL = completeness! In other words given a FULL OBSERVATION ( of numbers ) was not possible. every power law coming out against it all & showing a seemingly Infinite task. Godel was saying ‘this isn’t a productive way to pursue number science’ ( i,e looking for a theory of it all )
Godel was NOT saying ‘ if you must do it don’t use a computer aid’
Godel was not saying that Maths in incomplete because its wrong / nor that a human animal is imperfect thus the right solution is use a Human !!!
One cannot logically reach the following Penrose conclussion without being warped :
The Emperor’s New Mind (1989), Roger Penrose argued that Gödel-unprovable results are provable by human mathematicians
What ? !!!
Ok Roger – once you’ve remote viewed the contents of the universe with Grayling and they others get back to us with the WHOLE MATRIX OF NUMBERS. Thats only if your elite ‘SCIENCE’ clubs special metaphors of reality haven’t had the western world snuffed out during another of those big continental sized smash n grabs by that time.
You fucking idiot Penrose!
A very worthy footnote.
Everyone was groomed to trust these scientists. They turn out to be mentalist illusionist fakes. I have noticed a common trick that goes on – they slip in a few outright lies as possible ( at a very crucial moment in the flow ) then let the fantasy do the rest. Most often a bunch of metaphysical bull nuts needs 1 or at most 3 key manipulative lies to make the metaphysics seem like ‘FACT’ – a few strategic lies or logical fallacies said just at the right time! Stated in plain sight, designed to be SEEN but not understood for what they really are – these are deceptive sentences can be absolutely fallacious liar grade mislead, but still seem completely fine! Thus enabling the rest of the metaphysics to be taken a gospel TRUTH when its plain right in ur face OLD BOLLOCKS. To illustrate this effect please see again :
Quote Logician Kurt Gödel
In 1931, mathematician and logician Kurt Gödel proved that any effectively generated theory capable of proving basic arithmetic cannot be both consistent and complete. In other words, a
mathematically sound theory lacks the means to prove itself.[17] However, in his first book on consciousness, The Emperor’s New Mind (1989), Roger Penrose argued that Gödel-unprovable results are provable by human mathematicians.[18] He takes this disparity to mean that human mathematicians are not describable as formal proof systems, and are therefore running a non-computable algorithm. Unquote
You might read this para first – but the lie Penrose adopted is below. That lie is the critical deception thats caused the metaphysics to feel ’empirical/’ With this Penrose trick we’ve a fine example of when a corrupted sentence is the PIVOTAL enabling sentence thats eased the way forth for the fantasy to come What i’m saying is that whilst everyone is entitled to believe what they like & can do as much metaphysics as they like it is NOT RIGHT to deceive people into thinking its empirical science.
Again :
” In other words, a mathematically sound theory lacks the means to prove itself”
The above is a outright lie that breaths life into otherwise lifeless metaphysics. Penrose is (like Dr Frankenstein) just has bits of logical corpse on his bench. However by saying :
”In other words, a mathematically sound theory lacks the means to prove itself”
He has twisted Godels meaning and he then pretends HE instead knows what to do. < That is no wrong either if what happens next might be useful to humankind. It isn't – its just another of these remote viewing psychic guesses about the universe.
Like Dr Frakenstein Penrose created the fake impression concerning a fact of life that just isn't there & simply Penrose bit of logical fallacy do not solve anything. From that point on the weak minded will now believe the metaphysics nevertheless. Penrose used the sentence in several psychologically manipulative ways. Firstly as a whole it sets up a false impression of something Godel said ( but didn't ) This tactic is rather like Lacans revision of Freud in some ways considering Lacan used a similar revision by misquoting / remodelling the actual intended meanings of Freud. Presumably Lacan could have said his critics were 'mistaken' if questioned – or that it was only an interpretation. I have not seen anything that is verified to have been
stated by Godel himself in that PRECISE context. I'm saying i haven't – not that its not there. And its irrelevant if a copy does exist for Godel was explaining what Stanford quite well below. Its a pity Stanford cannot stick to facts more rather than helping fake up the like of Elizabeth Holmes & so on isn't it ? But anyhow :
Quote In order to understand Gödel’s theorems, one must first explain the key concepts essential to it, such as “formal system”, “consistency”, and “completeness”. Roughly, a formal system is a system of axioms equipped with rules of inference, which allow one to generate new theorems. The set of axioms is required to be finite or at least decidable, i.e., there must be an algorithm (an effective method) which enables one to mechanically decide whether a given statement is an axiom or not. If this condition is satisfied, the theory is called “recursively axiomatizable”, Unquote
So fundamentally speaking 'Incomplete' ( to Godel ) means 'not recursively axiomatizable' whether we can stomach the fact that the universe is too impossible to search or NOT !!
There is an excess of language in a Godel paper yes. There is in the traditional style of science thats being killed off. In Godels day no TV / Internet / a lot of STD's and not enough theatre meant spare time could be tedious without something to exercise the mind. Persons of Godels era were meticulous and did all they could to show WHY they reach a conclusion. ( unlike these metaphysical lightweight gnosticpussies now ). In many ways revising / cancelling Godel or ANY classical scientist is analogous to the survival prospects of richard dawkins grade Metaphysics. I.E they must also kill good science so that their own metaphysical shit can prosper. Its not enough just to compose the rubbish as the proper science says different.
We have to watch out for key 'turnaround lies'
''In other words, a mathematically sound theory lacks the means to prove itself''
The trouble is that dodgy statements like these blend in and mingle.
NOOOOO Roger Godel DID NOT mean that & theres no need for your METAPHYSICS to step in and deliver a theory of ALL Mathematics accidentally on purpose' while you form the other metaphysical tragedy ORCH OR waiting for someone to point out you've completed Maths in the process.
Theres no double nobel here you madman !
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/equality/resources/unconscious-bias/
Imperial college london mouthing off with its totalitarian level metaphysical theory of unconscious bias. Along such great white shark symbolism there really could not be a more aggressive anti white message.
My mother WW2 POW under the Japanese would have found this outrageous & she was a civil servant that was tortured by burning before being forced into sex slavery.
Hardly any of these blacks are actually directly related to a slave. Yet white people who are have to see this fucking war like de-population style propaganda from these institutions.
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/equality/resources/unconscious-bias/
”Your characterization of the pandemic as having malign intent seems to me to be due, instead, mostly to simple ignorance and incompetence: ”
Various styles of mRNA based gene adaptation experiments. Each concerned with the quest to establish a new digital health screen model science. Hoping to learn to standardise the human genome so that human DNA is adapted to suit medical software. I.E seeking how to devise a plug n play science for the human body without consulting a single member of the public.
Hardly a vaccine.
And it will have FAILED. The results will have shown that the theory of everything psychopaths medical version are MAD. Same as new atheist versions who said they could lab produce consciousness in a LAB . and the rest of these mad people like the cosmologist versions seeking to explain all outer space and every square fraction of hyperspace blah blah blah.
Can you see the similarity ? It doesn’t matter if you can or can’t with respect – thats up to YOU. Certainly we can conclude that ultra stupid people with a deep lack of respect for the other 99% exist. And that think they can decode the cosmos and the whole meaning of existence for some impenetrable reason. Richard Dawkins is a very special nut case in this respect as he has the brass neck to make a handsome living out of bashing other space cadets like himself even when doing silly stuff like this :
” Richard Dawkins and the new atheists suggest human consciousness can be cloned in a lab. But they can’t prove it ”
https://www.salon.com/2014/04/19/science_doesnt_disprove_god_where_richard_dawkins_and_new_atheists_go_wrong/
What gives mad people like richard dawkins the right to make these ridiculous suggestions is a mystery considering dawkins is obsessed with policing silly claims. Such people always seem to line their pockets with these scammy failure experiments – it THAT it ?
So the medical mad people thought the secrets of DNA would just fall out if gene were adapted in enough ways.What they got was /
Number Infinity = NO PATTERN = a different result each time
Get back to the drawing board you fucking sick misanthropic nut cases ( including YOU Dawkins )
The real tyrants forcing compliance today are:
“[A] uniquely American archetype: the affluent, white, female liberal — many of whom now sit atop our elite institutions.
The new CEO of NPR is a left-wing ideologue who supports wide-scale censorship and considers the First Amendment an impediment to her campaign to sanitize the world of wrong opinions.
[This powerful woman] is no aberration. She is part of a rising cohort of affluent, left-wing, female managers who dominate the departments of university administration, human resources, and DEI. They are the matriarchs of the American Longhouse: they value safety over liberty, censorship over debate, and relativism over truth.”
city-journal.org Christopher Rufo “Quotations from Chairman Maher”
“Thomas Edsall… in the New York Times[:] female approaches to conflict and competition have become normative among the professional class. Edsall quotes evolutionary biologist Joyce Benenson’s summary of those approaches:
‘From early childhood onwards, girls compete using strategies that minimize the risk of retaliation and reduce the strength of other girls. Girls’ competitive strategies include avoiding direct interference with another girl’s goals, disguising competition, competing overtly only from a position of high status in the community, enforcing equality within the female community and socially excluding other girls.’
Jonathan Haidt explains that privileging female strategies does not eliminate conflict. Rather it yields ‘a different kind of conflict. There is a greater emphasis on what someone said which hurt someone else, even if unintentionally. There is a greater tendency to respond to an offense by mobilizing social resources to ostracize the alleged offender.’”
http://www.firstthings.com “What Is The Longhouse?”
We have seen the New Tyrant of Compliance (“Girl Power! The Future Is Female!) and her name is TOXIC FEMININITY: The selfish, smothering, haughty, petty, vicious, vindictive, vain and puffed up Nanny State murderess of the Western world. The anti-mother.
”We have seen the New Tyrant of Compliance (“Girl Power!”
I find todays mass of explicit artificially baked shit stirring the most depressing aspect because it forewarns of a regime with nothing to lose by being openly and proudly totalitarian same as the chinese. In fact the dopey smiling expressions on faces of western politicians look like those of persons wanting the dictator style OUT. In the end all white people have been set up to take blame for what rich people of all colours have done. For now – once time is right they’ll play a dirty trick on others. At least by making it look like theres other issues it adds to the realism as to these people it makes little difference who is de-populated ( in the end presumably. The story of the trenches of WW1 did a marvellous job of making it all see like a big mistake. But now we’ve all seen the return of this dark cynical anti human attitudes toward the public, we’ve no way of knowing if that was just the way to deal with the anti war people if we are honest. Considering how many people are anti war in these days // the obvious war mongering taking place = maybe that better be wrong. Certainly theres is a vital difference between western and chinese habits when it comes to overt or covert dictatorships thus far. In the west the states workforce study to be dictatorial outlandish via a hidden multi agency pedagogy that not only educates them, but can share private information concerning people rap sheets in order to have people to target practice on! On the bright side it might be possible that people singled out just so some rug munchers can practice tellings wives ‘he threw you down the stairs’ has less to do with getting hot wives into refugees for SW G on Wife G cunnilingus than it seems. The evil scholar even knows how to create situations so that theres poor hapless persons for the states people to learn how to be mad about.
But its necessary to tell such fucking filthy lies innocent people that these social workers // Dr’s // head teachers ( blah blah ) go absolutely POTTY // OTT. Without stunts like that to create 100|% realistic anger – The State – would not be able to train its people to be psychotic in the first place & they’d be no onset of totalitarianism. They are all very long term programs also // = have existed all the time in the undercurrents. Nobody can boot up totalitarian inside 50 years. The only way to switch it on and get up running is for it to exist already hidden from view.
its been lurking in an undercurrent in western public sectors for decades because theres a part of the multi agency network that smears people. Like a shooting range model that helps teach-in high levels of aggression in social workers // head teachers // teachers// care staff // et al. They need live bait and the basic archetype is woman on man where hes supposed to have hurt a wife. We know theres many clones emergent now i.e linked to race sex gender all which are are fake hate driven same as the misandry shit stir.
”We have seen the New Tyrant of Compliance (“Girl Power! The Future Is Female!) and her name is TOXIC FEMININITY: The selfish, smothering, haughty, petty, vicious, vindictive, vain and puffed up Nanny State murderess of the Western world. The anti-mother”
Yeah – just reword to suit any shit stir.
Your characterization of the pandemic as having malign intent seems to me to be due, instead, mostly to simple ignorance and incompetence: The medical and political establishment was simply unprepared for what happened, although it should have been according to the lab leak hypothesis. So it turned out that many mistakes were made and the efforts toward compliance were often unjustified or counterproductive (not just here but in China and many other locations). So vaccinating kids and youth was wrong but vaccinating older adults, such as myself, was correct and saved many lives, likely including that of myself and my wife. Washing hands, etc., turned out to be unnecessary, but this was soon acknowledged, and masking and social distancing turned out to be quite helpful (though much more so with N95 masks): It took a few months to realize that the virus spread primarily through the nose.
It was a mistake to say that the first vaccines would slow the spread of the virus but correct to say it slowed the death rate (because they were acting as vaccines, if imperfectly). In retrospect studies concluded that the areas with higher compliance had lower death rates.