All Marxism is cult religious.
All Marxist “theory” begins by believing it uniquely knows what human beings really are (socio-spiritual beings), into what they have been thrown (a mundane world of property ownership, imposed identity, and suffering through scarcity), and to what we must return (a truly social society that transcends individualism). Because Marxists fundamentally believe they know the true and secret socio-spiritual nature of humans whereas (demonic, Demiurgic) social forces have conditioned everyone else not to know them, they feel uniquely entitled to power for the purpose of remaking man into who he is. This explains most of their behavior.
The ultimate goal of Marxism isn’t economic, political, or social control, as most would believe. Those are merely means to its end. Its ultimate goal isn’t even power, though it worships power as the constitutive force of reality. Its ultimate goal is to direct the socio-spiritual evolution of Man. Socio-spiritual in the sense that Man’s true spiritual nature manifests in his social relations. This is the idea of the “New Man” Marxists always speak of. He is Man spiritually evolved to remember who he truly is, a truly social and creative being that is one with all others in his species and, indeed, all of Nature.
This means that Marxism is just a particularly nasty, vindictive, and deceptive form of Gnostic theosophy, a cult religion. Laid bare of all its details in whatever form, economic, racial, sexual, whatever, it is a drive to seize power to direct the spiritual evolution of Man. Everything else it argues is either rationalization or excuse, none of it is real or legitimate because none of it does anything but serve its actual purpose in whichever moment of resistance it finds itself in.
What is meant by “direct the socio-spiritual evolution of Man”? In a word, eugenics. Marxism intrinsically practices eugenics, though not necessarily on the “crude” physical level (mundane) but on the more refined spiritual level they believe they uniquely understand. In practice, a lot of the crude part comes out by necessity. The goal is to prune out of mankind those unfit to evolve spiritually to the higher collectivist levels and to transform the rest into socio-spiritual Marxists.
In theosophical cults, Man is believed to have forgotten who he really is by virtue of some Fall. He is truly Spirit and One with God and thinks himself otherwise because of the distortions of his conditions: materialist, social, economic, or otherwise. He has forgotten this because he lacks “God’s wisdom” (theo-sophy) to know who—and what—he truly is, which is a spiritual being at one with the One. Since this is true for everyone all at once, no one is truly separate from anyone else. All is One; All are One. To be an individual in this circumstance is to reject Oneness in favor of individualism, which is Man’s Fall.
The goal of theosophical religious cults is to seize enough power over their adherents to remind them of who they “really are,” which brings them to “at-One-ment” (atonement for their false separation from God) by obliterating their allegedly false consciousness of themselves and Man. They misunderstand themselves and thus misunderstand the society and world around them. Theosophists aim to remind them of who they “truly are” and bring them back to Oneness of spirit and being. They can be kindly enough, but in the end, they are tyrannical because humanity can only evolve as a whole if their presumptions about the nature of reality and Man are true.
These cults are ultimately Gnostic. As the second-century Valentinian Gnostic Theodotus put it: “It is not, however, the bath [baptism] alone that makes free, but knowledge [gnosis] too: who we were, what we have become, where we were, where we have come to be placed, where we are tending, what birth is, and what rebirth.” Theosophists believe we were Spirit but have become mortal; we were in Paradise in perfect union with God but have been thrown into this mundane world; we are tending toward spiritual awakening or destruction; and birth is a Fall and rebirth is accepting their Gnostic cult beliefs and practices. It isn’t all just ancient heresy or New Age hippie nonsense. Marxism is cut from precisely this cloth.
The old Gnostic heresies place the Fall of Man in the Sin of Adam, obviously, blaming the wrath of God for flinging us out of Paradise and our inheritance into this world of work, pain, toil, and death—as individuals, separated from God and Eden. Their belief was that the Serpent in Genesis 3 told the truth, and the God in Genesis is not God but a demonic Demiurge, builder of the world, imprisoner of his spiritual brethren in Man.
Marxism, qua Marx, places the Fall in the separation of private property (thus individualism) from communal property (thus collectivism). The bourgeoisie is Demiurgic, constructing a political economy in which the masses must labor, suffer, and die. The masses can awaken as a class-conscious proletariat that understands Man’s true nature is socialist, which means being transcendent of private property and the individualism that follows from it. This program goes on through the other forms of Western Marxism.
Critical Race Theory, which is Race Marxism, puts the Fall in the creation and imposition of power-laden racial categories (“whiteness” and “white supremacy”), which is a proxy for Western values including capitalist economics and their cultural hegemony. “White people” become Demiurgic, imprisoning “people of color” in a world not made for them but willing to use them. They can become race conscious, though, and understand Man’s true nature is transcendent of race while retaining consciousness of it.
Queer Theory, which is Queer Marxism and overtly an esoteric religion based on sex, puts the Fall in the assertion of any valid claim to normalcy and legitimacy. “Normativity” is a Demiurgic force that imprisons perverts, weirdos, deviants, and degenerates, in addition to sexual and “gender” minorities, in a world that demands they be normal. They can become consciously queer, however, and understand Man’s true nature is transcendent of any norms or expectations.
The framework is the same in every case, and the details only vary a little as needed. A demonic superpower—the Demiurge, the bourgeoisie, whites, “cis” straight people, or whatever—orders and rules the world for itself. It did this by illegitimately taking a step toward godhood, separating itself from the All, and locked out those who are truly innocent and knowing. It is the projection of Satan onto the godly and godliness onto Satan. On the first page of the Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels say the whole of their program is put in a word: “oppressor versus oppressed.” The privileged establish themselves as separate and deserving while the innocent are excluded from “godlike” knowing and punished severely when they take a bit of the fruit of the tree of knowledge.
The Gnostic theosophical myth is that the innocent are excluded by powers who broke away from the unified totality of being to assert their individuality. Maybe they have done this through claiming deity themselves as Creator of the (mundane and Fallen) world, or in a socio-spiritual sense through private property, racial status, social status otherwise, etc. Because these deign to be God but are not, they are jealous and wrathful of anyone who might approach the “hidden truth” of gnosis, which would break their spell and end their illegitimate power. They hide and suppress the “truth” and punish anyone who seeks or stumbles upon it.
The theosophical gnostics know otherwise, though. They know the “gods” are false and that God as a unified totality is real and, in fact, not distinct from themselves. They are therefore spiritually or socio-spiritually advanced but oppressed and must shepherd Man to Liberation. This amounts to a revolution, either of Heaven and Earth or of society, depending on the locus of their beliefs, but it’s all the same. Marxism, Race Marxism, Queer Marxism, and the rest are identical in this form. They are all theosophical religious cults pretending not to be.
One way to put this is that theosophy, whether Marxist or otherwise, is Satan presenting himself as an Angel of Light until he creates a madness in those who follow him that way that possesses them with a spirit of enmity and false superiority presenting itself as righteousness and truth. You can know them by their fruits, it is said. What are their fruits? Entitlement. Narcissism. Self-aggrandizement. Accusation. Deception. Enmity. Sowing confusion, even in their own minds and hearts. Attempting to lead the little ones astray. Destruction, everywhere they go. It is Evil selling itself as uniquely Good.
Marxism cannot escape this cloth because Marxism is cut from this cloth. All Western Marxist “theories” are the same in this. They are destructive theosophical cults. All Marxism is cult religious.
56 comments
Dr Lindsay, you must have answered my question many times before: How to respond to the claim, “Jesus was a leftist” ?
WARNING: JAMES LINDSAY MAY BE A DOUBLE AGENT.
Yes, he might be working for the ultra-left. Why else would he incessantly introduce naive minds to figures such as Marcuse and Foucault; why would he tirelessly educate innocent minds on the likes of Hegel and dialecticity, or teach about structuralism and post-structuralisms? I was a good conservative until Dr. Lindsay, exposed me to so many thinkers of the Continental tradition and their radical ideas that, no matter how hard I try, my mind can no longer return to those simpler times. The damage he has done is irreversible. Now I cannot prevent myself from thinking about thinking and thinking critically, dialectically and deconstructively. I have been contaminated by so many profoundly powerful ideas and thinkers that I can no longer take my conservatism seriously, and have become what Dr. Lindsay promised me I should fear most: an intellectual!
Dr. Lindsay is like the man who wants to be absolutely sure he is not a homosexual, so he engages in homosexual sex just to prove to himself he doesn’t like it. Yet, in order to be abundantly certain he does not enjoy homosexual activity, he engages in it so habitually and methodically, that, well… let’s just say that Dr. Lindsay has GROOMED me to be a mind capable of understanding and thinking along with the Continental tradition since Kant, a mind able to wrestle with the destabilizing logics of the so-called post-modernists, a mind subtle enough to grasp the exhilarating and vertiginous implications of French Theory and psychoanalysis.
Please, don’t let the same thing happen to your children. This is how it starts. With podcasts by groomers like Lindsay, insinuating these concepts into their minds under the pretext of a warning, infiltrating these incredibly dangerous ideas under the reactionary banner. It is too late for me, but maybe not for others. Please. It is not enough NOT to send your children to college (or to make sure they study only safe technocratic scientisms and stay well clear of the Humanities). You must keep them away from Trojan Horses like this one, that under the mantle of prophylaxis actually provide the gift of death, the gift of the examined subject position, and, worst of all, the gift of ruining not just their lives but also ruining their deaths!
Quote : but also ruining their deaths! – Unquote.
Yes – as theres an awful lot of young people running around and around and around this global society’s place cell maze looking for the fake middle class status the globalist designed ( bait ) that not there. ‘The State’ can give it though ( according to way their dodgy narratives are structured ) as The State can deliver QOL ( quality of life ) that the parents were incapable of giving ( blah blah blah ). So yes imho its an impressive observer who can see the wannabe zombie living purgatory that actually consists young working class life. With a lot of them & when they cannot cope or work out what the treadmill is about they stab someone @ random.
Quote : engages in homosexual sex just to prove to himself he doesn’t like it. Unquote.
LOL i’m sure James might or might not resort to that but IS worthy of comparison either way! Really the time served process id skilled Misinformation, leading to what its social engineers want to be specific Disinformation outcomes is the higher potential. With the bent Grant // Funding schemes that exist, details of ‘bent acts’ concerning social engineering muck spreading, really does not need to be discussed explicitly. For Instance New Atheism et al did not inform its mad fanatics that the objective was to kill christianity just so that another big abrahamic religion could take over & the christian church could this be asset striped of Trillions. – but THAT WAS the outcome. Thus the followers of Richard Dawkins ( et al ) became determine militant psychotic anti religious nut cases on zero info in reality.
Because new atheisms followers were fed Misinformation. This phenomenologically bred Disinformation among them as the stories mutated with the madness of the pro Dawkins crowd.
So James only has to believe that the world shall be a better place with christianity wiped of the face of the earth 1.
In other respects he is spreading Misinformation, but it doesn’t mean he know it since there seems to be persons that have a hold on the man. ‘Bogtart’ loves to fly all the way to the UK and run to 400 acres of slavery derived upper norton oxfordshire like so like of cheap ladyboy just for instance.
Dear James,
Thanks for your insights. My wife and I totally agree with you.
However, if you want to reach the masses you need to be less intellectual and explain the ideas in laymen’s language. Also condense the ideas because that’s what the vast majority of people will understand. And your message needs to get out.
This really explains why my aunt is so condescending and dismissive to me. Because she realizes that she has the knowledge to change the world and I’m a right wing nutjob
James I appreciate this article but it is very confused. You can only claim the things you do in this article by almost deliberately ignoring the contradictions between intersectionality and Marxism. Intersectionality should be treated as a revisionist version of Marxism because it focuses on social factors and not material ones. Furthermore describing Marxism as “Gnostic” is absurd for a number of reasons, but if you consider Marxism to be a religion it must be the opposite of Gnosticism because it seeks “salvation” through material means while Gnosticism rejects the material world altogether as being evil. Its only through this misguided framework that you can claim the end “goal” of Marxism is not class equality but the “spiritual evolution of man” when arguably the latter is simply expected to come about because of the former, but it is silly to try and separate the two.
” Its only through this misguided framework that you can claim the end “goal” of Marxism is not class equality but the “spiritual evolution of man”
Yes well said, its very hard to fathom why such incongruence appears in james work sometimes. Fact remains hes a main guy out there committed to opposing all this & is a brave old warrior. But indeed these crass errors are difficult to watch.He was an abused by the baron of oxfordshire if that helps, although associate ‘Bogtart’ goes there for voluntarily indoctrination even now. One of the worlds few jet setting sado masochists perhaps.
& as such a bit too close to gnostic fools in the coven of metaphysicals ‘Gnostic’ since theres no reason to put up with snake oil such as being agnosticism sometimes when it suits. Dawkins spent decades defining atheism as a tool that seeks to exterminate agnosticism. In this sense NA’s are quite atypical creatures who refuse to ‘not know’ even when it came to things any human simply cannot ‘know’. So whilst N A’s founders I.E the four houseboys of the cabana lips all earn big living out of Atheism ( live or dead ) – they were scamming METAPHYSICS. A unique mixture that pretended the science method was the baseline when NONE existed. And an approach with ‘Atheism’ that in fact jumps in and out of agnosticism when ‘atheism fails to work ( which is often ) and then even to psychic power religions whenever it pleases them same as any common garden mentalist fraud does & new atheism is proven organised lying basically just as say ’Spiritualism’ is. Ohhhh but much worse lurks. New Atheism HQ enjoys a strange easy access to the worlds most eminent left wing political persons globally, and have permission to pontificate the religious inclination to their people. Therefore the way Dawkins et al are able to dictate atheism as well are psychic arts like remote viewing ( a metaphysical processes of establishing the contents of the universe is remote viewing ) is highly suspicious. New atheism was & still is anti agnostic even now, thus claims to KNOW = is GNOSTIC by deliberate and long contemplated design.
In other words new atheism will do whatever suits them when it comes to obstacles within the bounds of reality versus how it intends to fuck humanity over by compiling rules of life, for tyrants, for the CASH.. Given THIS is the Totalitarian style supernature LINDSAY is trying to ‘beat’ – then we can only conclude that ant new atheist follower will be indoctrinated to blame the rest of the world for what new atheism is doing, = again is just Atypical to orgs involved in formulating totalitarian logics. I suppose Dawkins et al are so deluded by their own brainwash they think these things do not show.
Anyway the proof that they habitually colonise supernatural behaviours is here on Graylings Wiki : ( which i’ve posted over and over ad nauseam I know = I know)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A._C._Grayling
Quote : Among his contributions to the discussion about religion in contemporary society he argues that there are three separable, though naturally connected debates:
(a) a metaphysical debate about what the universe contains; denying that it contains supernatural agencies of any kind makes him an atheist;
(b) a debate about the basis of ethics; taking the world to be a natural realm of natural law requires that humanity thinks for itself about the right and the good, based on our best understanding of human nature and the human condition; this makes him a humanist;
(c) a debate about the place of religious movements and organisations in the public domain; as a secularist Grayling argues that these should see themselves as civil society organisations on a par with trade unions and other NGOs, with every right to exist and to have their say, but no greater right than any other self-constituted, self-selected interest group. Unquote.
Speaks like an absolute slut with respect to how his brain views humanity as if looking down via a skylight / looking glass oracle @ them. I.E philosopher kings with special powers able to ‘THINK’ therefore remote view the cosmos with their minds eye concerning whats there and isn’t
(a) a metaphysical debate about what the universe contains; denying that it contains supernatural agencies of any kind makes him an atheist;
So the infinite range of their special power metaphysics defines the atheist for Grayling.
Thus ? who knows whats actually going on in that brain of Lindsay. New atheists tracking down psychics / heretics / religious people has been a never ending witch hunt that would make mathew hopkins weep with joy!. Though jointly they openly declare their own MASTERY of the supernatural & on a cosmological level.
James isn’t quite like Joe 90 steeping into a whirling brainwash apparatus for mission download to his brain – just similar. We could pointlessly ask who programmed James Lindsay to smear others with all of the things new atheism is doing ? Well – its nobody on an individual bespoke basis surely once the algorithm has done it. It shall have been humans who designed the algorithm responsible once yes. But NOT new atheists like RD or ACG as they are too thick. New Atheism has been working to totalitarian design specifications because they’ve been supplying elitists with social engineering designs. Anyone once a follower can be mentally infected by the deliberate incongruence used by NA. New atheism uses an anti religion cover story, but is a lab that designs psychological weapons for totalitarian regimes. As such its got an auto smear feature built in that teaches all its followers to behave like this.
The difference between indoctrination ( and not ) is complex. One aspect involves an inbuilt inability to notice conflicting logic as does exist in the elitist made fairy story of new atheism. James more or less tries to describe what would be godless aether type substance caused by Marx when theres a far more rational phenomenological explanation.
So these childish structural poltergeists that James inflicts on himself ( they make him seem crass frankly ) were designed by New Atheism not Marx
”James I appreciate this article but it is very confused”
Put it this way maybe ? Take the frankfurt school. Historically has consisted of 90% of persons putting together ideas intended to work positively toward the good / fairness of humanity. The remaining 10% mean ill from the beginning are determined theirs shall works against humanity. Overwhelmingly driven by a plethora of descriptions as to how human dignity and wealth can be shared better is the Frankfurt school with a minority of bad intent. However the irony is that a human condition / predicament exists where anything that ‘WORKS’ ( for humanity ) only requires modest adaptations to work against. The quest thus becomes one of making ALL Material look the same by revision = turn it all BAD. Its that way it is almost impossible to tell what intent was of any author from casual observations. This means being exceptionally well read in the school is the only ay to make sense. The trouble with the FS is that the elite mobs recognised what effectively algorithms are made there. James either does not understand this specific natural selection predicament or choses to ignore it.
As a rule of thumb everything is classed as psychiatric @ the FS simply as this world is run by humans & all human systems are process by a human brain. Everything we do or say is thus controlled by psychiatric processes & therefore the whole thesis ( @ FS ) concerns what all things mean minus psychic abstractions.
So ofc concepts like ‘Intersectionality’ have dimensions to the that are beyond the fringe & this is being mistaken for an all knowingness religion. How ? – the entire point of the FS is there other habit of placing ‘infinity’ on every concept. I.E the attitude that all is never known about that concept since it can change and evolve according to the quality of conscience. General I.Q. and creativity of those involved. James worst mistake ( perhaps ) is to refuse to acknowledge the existence of a positive intent @ the FS itself & concentrate on the 10%. This is easily done given the dictators @ the top of the 1% indeed do cause ALL FS to manifest as BAD.
But theres a difference in circumstances as to how that happens & James can be shit at doing it.
He doesn’t understand how logic is processed by the FS is the problem & he concentrates of narrow problems such as the ways its only obvious a violent minority is present everywhere & that the worlds richest turn anything usual to them BAD.
So what ? – everyone already knows these narrow viewpoints.
“” Quote I summon my inner Virgil and steel myself to the horror of the truth (attributed to Cato, reused by Freud): Homo homini lupus = Man is a wolf ” ” Unquote.
I refer to your impeccable pointers much // though am being general poster as well as yours & the polemics are artificial as usual :
Yeah precisely. If anything i’ll gird my own loins even more knowing that turning back from the route marked ” Anti Marx Road ” to the previous junction leads to a multiplex of insane choice. They’ll be infinite signs, but the one denoting ”To Freud” is going to have every hideous creature known to humanity ready to pounce along there. One can then realise the mind of the algorithm & thats all very well. But to espouse Freud is to seem like giving an admission of insanity given the hideous truth. In any case one does not walk the road just to understand the freudian model concerning the mapping topography of metacognition. Take the example you gave :
”Susan Sontag called “the prototypically modern revelation: a Negative Epiphany”. ”
Personally i very much like the new phrases that arrive with fresh thinking & ‘Prototypicality’ is a lovely turn of phrase. She is just referring to concepts long previously known though ofc, given that actually shes re-written the core components of Platos Objective Idealism. But that is no disadvantage, and in fact many have so enduring is the construct. Penrose & Hammeroff with the ‘orchestrated objective reduction’ theory of consciousness are ( by implication ) ‘reducing’ the chemical mechanobiological complexities of the brain into a discrete digital arrangement that uses prototypical gestalt choices = ? Pretty much the closest match from a photographic memory we’d need to imagine had instant response level speeds ( no latency ). If latency exists you have an imbecile. In fact if latency is ‘on a spectrum’. Thus it could be claimed that all mental health problems are in some way ‘latent’ .
But then ofc the trouble with anything that neatly falls into these ‘on a spectrum’ chapters is that an imbecile can understand them I.En say Psychopathy is @ 31 degrees in this one dimension. We are therefore left with the question can we really simplify like this? Or have we machine learned ourselves how to normalise being a idiot ? Personally i’m not hasty toward the latter feeling there is some truth in one dimensional thinking so long as the missing dimensions are ‘out there somewhere’. With this ? – well we have Sontags take.
Likewise Lacan is always going to be wrong just because he waited until freud was dead. Then – he could stitch him up & thus found post structuralism in the relative peace. Binaries could be de-coupled without freudian influence forbidding it. Flipping freud over 180 prevent new students becoming anti Hegel mechanisms firstly.
Lacan lied that it was a ‘return to Freud’ Lacan only executed his concepts so that a new era of deconstruction could commence. HUGE numbers of pro post structuralist apologists have guarded the doors to freuds tomb ever since afraid his ghost might walk again // thus reveal the mind of the machine.
And freud is the devil hence NO. Anything GOOD is BAD once its no longer what is was after a post structuralism. ANYTHING.
Later ? – once a cohort of students are condition learned to fill the unconscious with things grossly to the advantage of dictators instead of REASON. and what is ‘reason’ after all in such context? Well perhaps not so much a substance which HAS to be experimentally known, so much as intuitively comforting. In that sense its fair to a majority & isn’t narrowed to warm the hearts of the elite! The most important thing about ‘reason’ is its fairness to all epiphenomenon. It really isn’t so much a deep state of ‘TRUTH’ unless that of a wide enough band of pro human ‘existential truth’ so that the society using ‘reason’ has the ability to overwhelm the meaning of things even when meanings remain unknown. Take the phase i just used ‘Existential Truth’. Isn’t that some kind of oxymoron when relate to all society needs since it much relate to the singular experience ? Certainly it is & what i’m saying should be nonsense. But NOT in the wide context where ‘fair society’ has a difficult task in hand concerning how to use ‘reason’ which the most people can relate to in their own existential positioning. Thus it could be truth to say that it is due to these unnoticed subtitles, that the totalitarian organisations swallow up all the existential consideration factors for thier own activists.
They are bound to if social entitlement is laying around unclaimed simply because the masses cannot articulate very well of matters of prototypical modelling into the MASS. In other words any singular perception ( with worded formula as the by that time ‘peoples voice’ ) that a mass of people want to put to their government. However – the total ruler mindset of the dictators thinks its done nothing wrong by making it hard to understand the intellectual rule IT OBEYS.
What if there is not even these supposed narrow scraps of reason to track down / evaluate / innovate / present to them ? In other words there just isn’t any form of reason the globalists will listen to If there are none at all with all certainty then obviously they are going to scorch the earth again. It is reasonable to say that if what the people need makes no difference to THEM on the basis that nothing can be done to prevent war by high humanity against low humanity. We best hope there are morsels of difficult to interpret epistemological microcosmos out there to take in (& throw up over yes) Not good choices. But not shoot its messengers as theres nothing else on the table.
As i remarked hes not wrong conceptually on everything just because he was a bastard.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14649360701360196
‘Extimacy’ – in other words a way to describe ones inner feelings // project them into the world at large & still feel a sense of manifestation from within, whilst the perception is ‘without’ = feeling when in contact with the corporeal. Good examples of this exist in phrase as shown below :
Quote : To substantiate this claim, I explore the extimacy of the most popular vehicle accessory in the USA since the 1980s’ ‘Baby on Board’ signs: the ‘ribbon magnet’. Specifically, I elaborate the extimate contours of two ribbon magnet slogans, ‘Half Of My Heart Is In Iraq’ and ‘I Support More Troops Than You’. Affirming a recent critique that social and cultural geographers have ‘tamed’ psychoanalysis. Unquote
All i would say about this form of outlook is that Me / You/ Anyone / James – none of us need to ‘believe’ in constructs like these in order for social engineers to successfully implement them. Just believe they will and do. However the most valuable thing here rests with us all getting a grip of our cognitive biases, for it is they by which the scholars from hell manipulate us. What we need to do it get back to basics, and unfortunately even evil bastards like Lacan both knew what they were doing, and came out with constructs that could be used for good or evil.
Thats just it – there isn’t a construct born of good intent that cannot be restated and flipped 180 to EVIL.
Well sweet 13. Thats another fine steam of consciousness you got me into. And i’m repeating myself a lot too so James has clearly been influential ..
Gestalt. The prototypically 1960s con.
(A final digressionary story in this comment thread):
I was a part-time “psychotherapist” in the 1990s (all gay male clients until I finally couldn’t stand listening to any more narcissistic whine fests about the burdens of not being loved for themselves but only for their gigantic penises). To change clientele direction, I took some “professional development” workshops, one of which was Gestalt Therapy. I only knew of Gestalt as some form of EST-like California hippie New Age bullshit but I went to their info session anyway.
The Gestalt leader bloviated pretentiously while basking in his own ego and concluded his performance by informing us that the final Gestalt training session involved each trainee in turn getting stark naked, standing under a bright light in the middle of the group and having each trainee and the leader scrutinize and verbally critique the nude person’s body.
The Gestalt leader was a balding overfit leering middle aged man and every trainee but me was a young nubile buxom female, all of whom began quivering their cleavage obviously overcome with anticipatory psycho-sexualized frisson. I felt like I had accidentally stumbled into an audition for a bad 1970s heterosexual porn film so left during the coffee break. While leaving, the leader said to me, I guess you’re not Gestalt and I said no I’m Ge-Gay good-bye.
With their crazy Gestalt parents, no wonder the children of Woke are so insane.
The End. (of everything apparently)
”crazy Gestalt ”
You know how hilarious that post is surely 🙂
I’m always faintly shocked at stories where someone performs a social metastasis into orgy like desire from what is an ordinary situation. Even a gestalt session is ‘basic’ in nature. But in any case the man took free association & conflated it with ??? There isn’t much one can verbalise along gestalt lines without talking in avante garde terms. Sounds like the guy thought he could get away with sexual energy from a psychophysical perceptual position.I will say that whenever i held evening classes in philosophy there seemed to be 8 /10 copping off with each other. One class i had was at a large church converted into an art centre. Frequently as i left via the graveyard the pupils were copulating in there.
” Marx Freire, Woke, ”
I’m afraid so Rocky.
Whats more i can write a semi incoherent & not entirely logical post & get away with it my luck must be changing.
I suppose it help to know // i know NOTHING. Its that urge to give an opinion that saves that nothingness day maybe.
I reckon thats what they are doing certainly & even if it was so it doesn’t diminish James @ the coalface.
Brave man.
Quote from Steven Brizelsays:
MARCH 15, 2024 AT 3:50 PM
”Marxism is rooted in the false ideology that msn cannot change or redeem himself and is trapped forever in his state ” Unquote.
Although this post is not a message to Steven = he made a good point.
The trouble with new discourses is that it combines the best guy in the counter argument business with some of the most fundamental mistakes in the meta epistemology. James placed himself in a sealed chamber over Freire for instance – a marxist whose influence over totalitarianism is actually anti totalitarian. Thus the work of PF plucked out of thin air just because there was some framework of ‘marxism’ involved even where the aim of Friere was similar to that of Lindsay! Surely it is fair to say that the actually totalitarian community are aware of this form of effect. Being so they can exploit & much of a totalitarian scholars time is consumed by inserting ( what i’d call ) ‘Abstraction Mazology’. I.E not so much ‘abstract’ like in the case of fragmented logic immediately, more the creation of culverts / forks in the roads of logic & Freire was perfect for this. Meaning – PF really has no impact on todays state of affairs just because they were weak marxists & the like of Lindsay et al have been sent off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this way when matters are <<<<<<<<<<<<<<< < that way.
All too often – in other words there is simply a WEALTH of weak marxist intellectual irrelevance to get enmeshed in if one must !!
The fact is that todays descent into forth reich decadence has as many hotspots as it likes with which to steer its pursuers away. Even MARX himself is almost a complete red herring since their algorithm certainly does not require Marx & actually the frameworks around him are only in place since there is a legion of illiterate covil servants all over europe & the americas who only speak in marxist tongue. Thus ? – Marx is implemented simply in order to prevent a huge task concerned with re-educating what is an ignorant self taught group consciousness of left field savages. People that serve officialdom and are scavengers on 'Marx' within the servant classes of european & american institutions.
Even the basic act of taking 'Marx' this seriously is flawed given that all of the disadvantages totalitarian society brew up from him are obtainable from multiple other intellectual sources!! Yes it can be expedient to use phrases such as 'the marxists' this and the marxists that – i do all the time. Never once have i considered 'Marx' to be the archetypal problem & theres no reason to. There is a basic reason why anti totalitarian intellectuals avoid using the simple but more accurate description of the problem & its that it will appear 'religious'. Nevertheless i'd still point out ( from an agnostic position ) that its more accurate to work with the fundamental idea that Misanthropy is the main driver & that only fools look to Marx et al in search of a solution to that force. So 1 problem is that 'Marx' is involved, is not a driving principle & therefore the level of interest ( in him ) is not logical.
The Archetype is Misanthropy & why the totalitarians want that state.
In debates on New Discourse nothing more than the relatively trivial influence of Karl Marx in an esoteric religious context has been literally considered the archetypal driver.
Looking at the material James Lindsay has published in past 3 months its becoming more and more clear a law of diminishing returns is biting in because , really, its all saying the same old Marx obsessed red herring no matter what new title is applied. I can 'sense' JL's writers block simply from the diminished potency of those recent articles & the frustrating same old of them. The solution is a rethink.
1 – place MISANTHROPY centre stage
2 – Place every public intellectual historic or otherwise in a tool box status.
3 – Never make the algorithmically mistake that Karl Marx was that important again.
So to return to the very good observation Steven made :
''Marxism is rooted in the false ideology that msn cannot change or redeem himself and is trapped forever in his state '' Unquote.
Yes – but that only happens once the dictators notice someones created word opium & they can exploit it. What anti marxism needs to do is admit to itself that the anti marxism kingdom ( its collective / group consciousness / community / or sum total of ALL its chagrin ) is a psychotic kingdom itself that hates a EFFECT more that it can rationally hate Marx himself. I'm saying theres NO Hope of breaking down these totalitarian algorithms of emotional irrationality that hates mere irrelevant phenomenological effects on in charge of the anti. This means that it is required we see that 'Marx' ( himself personally ) was out to improve peoples lives but is all went paer shaped when totalitarians saw that PEOPLE would listen to Marx. Therefore ?
Well its simple – they'd exploit the words of marx negatively. I'm saying that if james lindsay was in marxist shoes & had garnered the peoples attention we'd be talking about Karl Lindsay right now since ANY message that attracts the admiration of 'the people can become a carrier for totalitarianism once they reconfigure that message to delver the version that want. This also means that we are not even hearing any actual authentic 'Karl Marx' – we are hearing from versions of it that were configured to suit Totalitarianism. We becomes fans of Marx – fuck NO !!
The who thing out there is a booby trapped maze consisting of things that dead people have supposed to have stated but didn't once the texture and context has been altered.
I don't like chasing my tail like a psychotic pantheist new atheist initiate personally & i'd suggest you jettison that fucking mangled new atheist training pack ASAP before it drags you to your public intellectual grave,Peter Bogtart might take notice of this also instead of jet setting around like a silly gurl to bottom feed off the glory hole of the baron of oxfordshire.
a phenomenological ilk
“[Paulo Freire] really has no impact on today’s state of affairs…”
Really?
“The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education is… a dynamic digital encyclopedia continuously updated by the world’s leading scholars and researchers.” Entry on: “Paulo Freire… Published online: 29 March 2017
Among the many thinkers, teachers, activists, and writers with whom he has been compared are Lao Tzu, Confucius, Plato… Rousseau, Maria Montessori… Hegel, Karl Marx, John Dewey, Mahatma Gandhi… Antonio Gramsci… Simone Weil, Martin Buber… Hannah Arendt, Che Guevara… Julius Nyerere… Michel Foucault, Ivan Illich [and] bell hooks [!]… This is by no means an exhaustive list.” oxfordre.com
This Oxford list suggests Freire might be a person with some impact of today’s state of affairs.
As well, the daily public reality of masses of Western students marching in the streets calling for the death of Jews as “oppressors” of the “oppressed” Hamas also suggests an impact on today’s state of affairs via the practical application of Freire’s main idea that humanity is divided into oppressors and oppressed” (“Pedagogy of the Oppressed”). Where did these students learn Freire’s ideas: they’ve been taught to them in school for decades under the guise of “diversity”.
The K-12 teacher training of Ontario Institute for Studies in Education’s Master of Teaching graduate program course materials include “Pedagogy of the Oppressed” as a critical resource. I attended courses at OISE in the 1980s as part of my MSW thesis on “Pedagogy of the Oppressed” [applied strictly to highly specific adult groups] and have watched with horror the growth of Freire’s influence in the real world via the education system:
“Facilitating Critical Conversations: A Teaching Resource for Challenging Oppression in Toronto District School Board Classrooms, Toronto District School Board 2024; Core Beliefs (page 7): Education is a colonial structure that centres whiteness and Eurocentricity and therefore it must be actively decolonized.”
Freire’s impact on today’s state of affairs was never directed towards metaphysical, ontological, epistemological, phenomenological or who-gives-a-flying-fuckological eggheadian puffed-up snoot-snout pundit-gumflappers like this Grayling creature you frequently mention. Freire’s ideas were always aimed at the common lemming Red Guard angry manipulable high-school and university student cohorts who can be riled into Manichean witch-hunt simpleton-brute frenzy-rages as “champions” of Freire’s “oppressed” (eg. Hamas) by calling to “decolonize”, i.e. literally KILL, their “oppressors” (eg. the Jews).
Yes, there is a meta-level of ruling Totalitarian Elite Overlord monstrousness happening everywhere. But there is also a grassroots ground-level war, orchestrated and financed for their own benefit by these elite monsters, against ordinary people that is happening to their children with horrific real world consequences for the very survival of the “little people” who the Monsters want crushed. I see New Discourses as a tool for these “little people” (myself included) to help develop a better understanding of the causes and effects of this war against them so that they may fortify themselves to resist the onslaught. Nothing more and nothing less.
ps
You often refer to “New Atheists” (upper case) and I’ve mentioned that I know almost nothing about them. I go back before them to the “old atheism” (lower case) of the 1960s/70s with O’Hair and earlier to Russell.
My hippie-junior high school pals and I all went through an “atheist” phase in the early 1970s when we’d skip school to hang out at a drughead friend’s house (father dead, mother worked) watching The Three Stooges on tv while sampling his psychedelics. Weekday truancy was all about Hawkwind and Hashish, so loud and potent they dislodged roof shingles and brain cells. (I long ago ditched the hashish but still listen to Hawkwind and watch the Three Stooges — Jerome Howard aka Curley was a comic genius).
We also all read Bertrand Russell’s 1927 “Why I Am Not A Christian” (constipated Fabian rubbish) and watched Madalyn Murray O’Hair who founded “American Atheists” in 1963 and appeared constantly on tv talk shows where evangelical audiences would scream abuse at her and her son (hilarious!). Our constant diet of subversive underground comix also underscored our post-hippie/pre-punk (a golden moment to come of age) anti-everything ethos. But our “atheism” soon faded away as the drug use and Life both grew more complicated.
When the “New Atheists” arrived on the internet, I dismissed them all as pretentious supercilious bores. I recall seeing one of them, “Sam Harris”, in an online clip during covid where he looked bloated, dishevelled and hungover, zoom-calling from what appeared to be a dank porn basement where he began screeching at the camera, almost in tears, that Trump would “Kill Us All!” I presumed his career must have been faltering and that his hysteria was evidence that he was transing himself to secure an audition for a lucrative gig on The View. Harris and Squawkin’ Dawkins were the epitome of hypocrisy and had nothing to do with the concept of “atheism” since they were not anti religion or God but only anti Christian out of what seemed like peevish spiteful kicking of an easy target that they knew would not fight back.
Both showed their yellow-bellied true colours as they cunningly evaded the topic of the religion of Islam for years. But now that Islam is taking over and since Islam never ever forgets any criticism, Harris and Dawkins are pooping their panties in terror that once Islam gains power in the West, it will turn its fury on their very public anti-religious careers. I read that Dawkins has even “come out” as a “cultural Christian”! Admitting that he only had the freedom to hate Christianity and Judaism in public because Judeo-Christian societies are actually FREE whereas Islamic societies are NOT FREE and where “atheism” like homosexuality is a head-chopping transgression. So much for “New Atheism’! Pusswuss lickspittles out to make an easy buck off mixed up young males. Despicable. Throw all of these ass-licking self-aggrandizing liars and cowards to the butchers of ISIS.
” ps You often refer to “New Atheists” ”
Yes – and the reason is i feel they are not anti religionists at all but a covert social engineering lab that works on a contractural basis for the globalists. Since i’ve done it a lot i won’t stray into the anti christian – cum – rise of islam factor they’ve assisted with. Suffice it to say i agree completely with your analysis.
I mean look new atheism is embarrassing in many ways & first of all they’ve used their own skills in propaganda to fake each others level of intelligence & I.Q. so lol talk about the brothel mentality of egoism. There theres filth like the way one of them inherited a 400 acre estate from slavery. This is highly embarrassing and very upsetting considering that other forms of social engineering have tossed anti white movements slavery histrionics to rip apart like wild dogs. Very few people today are closely or directly related to a slave. But my mother was one in the dutch east indies under the japanese ( Tjideng camp ) and i’m fucking WHITE.
I detest the totalitarian friendly package that is or was ‘New Atheism’ because they only embrace the epitome of todays political occult concerning Post Truth < this being the area i'm most interested in since 'PT' is the core guiding principle involved in the algorithmic politics of the NWO.
NA has never had a shred of scientific basis as claimed by richard dawkins, its just hegelian metaphysics.
What a coincidence! & does this as such debunk the nations in my other post where i state Marx et al are superfluous to the debate & the post truth. NO – because the debate should have looked toward Hegel all along.
Once Hegel is coherently in the fame, Marx is entirely Obsolete – so are Marcuse – Freire etc etc etc. All they need in addition is a evil misanthropy enabled abomination of Freud & we have the mind of their algorithm in focus.
1 -Hegel / Cancel binary relationships
Here say for instance with LAW. During the TRUTH ERA law process was a time consuming and costly process using logical judgement & taking in facts that measure vectors and distances between poles of right and wrong = Binaries. In the POST TRUTH ERA you cannot have that unless you pay. This isn't 'Marxism' , in a terrorist tax law similar to the witchcraft acts carried out by matthew hopkins et al. Blasphemous style laws are made up & we are tried like witches – but by an Algorithm instead of Mathew Hopkins.
This is terror & Fascism born from a state where authoritarianism elasticating toward fascism where politics fears no ballot box. And it has nothing to do with Marx at all.
2 – Freud Implicit and Explicit forms of meta epistemology.
In my last post i described how the major trapping of society involved luring society into false belief of a kind thats not being discussed accurately on this site. This is the 'place cell' effect i illustrated in order to show how Marx et al are being baited. in order to fool us into the belief that they are the problem ( and thus control us all like rats in a maze). I am certain that is the case & that the globalist algorithmic design requires NONE because its using ALL. So / – anyone can with accuracy predict that actually 'MARX' is involved. However that pales into insignificance when an algorithm, is – Fascist -meaning its using any politics and philosophy it likes including most gross crimes against humanity if it deems fit.
So its nonsense to identify any specific act of Misanthropy via any definition philosophy. And why would a global regime thats not telling the truth offer such truth anyway ? Lets not say because little people can understand it PLEASE because thats a default to giving up considering little people simply cannot yet understand this algorithm & thats how the totalitarians intend to keep it.
The complexity of this matter is indeed yet another enemy then yes. We'd rather it be more simple & in many ways new discourses is a 'sketch' thats trying to make it so, but failing miserably since NA IS is the pace cell maze. Outside of the maze James should perform better.
We would remain incompetent and stupid should we blame Freud. By rule of thumb using intelligent history than honestly informs the public is basically not allowed. The revisionists go in and alter the words of every scholar by 90% until they are an evil scholar. The result is we end up being controlled BECAUSE we distrust Marx just as much as we shall have been should our personal metacognition have been unable to read him, and digest his good parts & not so good ones.
So we have the worst of all worlds in the place cell maze THEY invented chasing MARX – and NOT chasing their algorithm
THEY WIN !
3 – The POST TRUTH ERA / its Algorithms.
As i just remarked we are not engaged with the actual problem because we've been fooled into wasting our lives chasing Karl Marx.
And are thus absolutely stupid.
Thank you. That was your most lucid and illuminating comment and clearly presents what you’ve been saying all along. Now I get it. Beyond the big picture of Marx, Freire, Woke, etc. (the chess pieces) is an even bigger picture of a Totalitarian Controller (the chess master) who is using the chess pieces for his own monstrous game while laughing because we, his pawns, have no idea we’re being played. Behind the curtain of the beast is an even bigger beast. Yes. I see it. Even if I don’t want to, I must.
Yet another example of what Susan Sontag called “the prototypically modern revelation: a Negative Epiphany”. This negative epiphany has moved my understanding to the next level. Up? No, down. Like Dante, horrified as each level he descends becomes worse than the one before, I summon my inner Virgil and steel myself to the horror of the truth (attributed to Cato, reused by Freud): Homo homini lupus = Man is a wolf to man.
I need to re-read some Dostoevsky (or watch some Three Stooges) to cleanse my psyche.
”Really? ”
Yes good friend. By FAR not enough is known concerning the meaning of post truth.
Quote -(“Pedagogy of the Oppressed”). Where did these students learn Freire’s ideas: they’ve been taught to them in school for decades under the guise of “diversity” – Unquote
New Discourses is a pedagogy of the oppressed –
The question is then – why – is a word like ‘Pedagogy’ activating fear neurons?
If a mere word can do THAT ( and this s a wide effect as word after word is being considered evil ) then the totalitarian regime will have an utter walk over & we are all dead already as they’ll own the entire english language.
What we have to do is look at the specific impact any of these philosophers had within their own time – not what they became post propaganda. In Freires case his outreach was extremely limited to principles concerned with helping people to face their oppressed surroundings full stop, there were no greater agenda. He was not political in the sense he was penetrating education for the purpose of criticality as per now within todays neo feudalist technocracy.
What you mean is that like with Marx, there has been lazy acquisitions and revisions if his words. What i’m saying is that the taking over of the ‘big name franchise effect’ ( as it were ) is what has gone on. For instance Lacan was very cunning with what he did in his ‘Return to Freud’. In any case one of the biggest cover ups and propaganda exercises in this word concerns Freud – since – the totalitarians do not want anyone to know that thier sociological design / algorithm is based of freudian theory. That is the case NOW – their A,I, algorithms attack the consciousness of the woke by manipulating the interplay between the human conscious and unconscious. You see – with a mastery of both implicit and explicit propaganda it can be predicted with accuracy ( statistically ) how the minion will respond. By ‘respond’ i mean the globalists know how to get the subliminal effects they require. Lacan didn’t tribute Freud he eliminated him. This is since the post structuralists knew that if the population remained in intelligent control of the metacognition you could not manipulate them. The bottom line with freud is that his advice to persons was not a ‘cure’ – it was just a prevention of self delusion. In other words he spoke in a manner that simply remarked about how to avoid abusing our own inner world. To do that takes self critique
= TOTALITARIAN WIN WIN WIN isn’t it ? NO !! – not unless we shoot ourselves in the feet & thats the way this trap is designed.
I.e we’ve been programmed to assume automatically that the phenomenon of self critique iITSELF s the problem just because its Critical Theory. Right ? – the totalitarian regime FAKE that. And this is followed up by endless quantities of sociological red herring / big budget propaganda to back this fake up.
What they’ve done actually is train the public to attack mere words and phrases so that the end product becomes an inability to use self critique. This on the idiotic basis that the word CRITICAL is evil. As is Transformation – as is Pedagogy – as is EVERY word going to be in the end unless the current dysfunctional response stops.
In other words – not the entire approach – but often that taken by New Discourses is FLAWS. But taking the bait and in effect capitulating to be scared of words NA only facilitates the ongoing attack on Metacognition as has been designed by the totalitarians.
‘Metacognition’ is its more fundamental only means personal individual independent thinking. I’m wondering how long it will be until some smart ass scholar for the globalists pulls even more Freire out so that ‘Individual’ is thus an evil word & so is ‘Independent’ & so on.
Can you not see they are colonising the english language & that like this ( word fear ) there won’t be any left to Trust ?
Most of these people – Marcuse – Marx – Freire et al – wrote in a context which wasn’t particularly edifying to todays world. We’d have understood it far better had we been of their age. But BRAND has power ( not having one is weak ) and the amount of fake revision is rift. The actual figures did NOT STATE most of the things which are considered to have been said by them. In my case ? – i’m just not a slave to the manipulation and fake revision factor that exists under their ‘Brands’.
And i’m saying that Totalitarianism is presenting inaccurate revisions of these persons in order to control the world & they are closing down the common ability to think for ourselves with these fake representations.
Why ? – accurate readings from the work of those persons would not work – they’;ve corrupted them to suit because = work – that is honest and in favour of the people is ?
NOT ALLOWED!! Later someone will have done to James Lindsay if hes deemed important enough. He isn’t important enough to revise since hes spreading word fear & helping close down the english language & self critique.
Totalitarianism as works since it foments distrust. Lindsay won’t like my analysis & we all end up having no trust.m I’m not wrong about this. Just ask yourself how long there is to go at the current rate of self mutilation of the english language by the anti woke.
Sorry i fumbled this sentence :
Why ? – accurate readings from the work of those persons would not work – they’;ve corrupted them to suit because = work – that is honest and in favour of the people is ?
I meant to say this :
The ongoing process is the revision of any work that might be useful to the proletariat. It is VITAL to understand that no matter who the historic scholar was, another will come along later & restate their work to suit Totalitarianism. So lok – though ( me personally ?) – i’d never work with marx / marcuse freire or many of these thinkers in any case simply as there is no need. What i do instead in keep up with the latest BS thats being added onto their work because those interprets are a giveaway to the psych of totalitarianism. I.E the lies they add to the revisions of their work is an insight into the lies of today. Does this in any way cause a admiration for say Marx – no don’t be stupid.
I’m not going to be manipulated by the globalist fake. And i’m not going to be manipulated by third part misconception in the anti woke arena !!!!
In any case there hardly any power is taking a blind bit of notice of all this absurd ‘Marx this & Marcuse that’ nonsense. The salient area today is keeping tabs on the post truth algorithm since that is not dependent of any particular thinking complex whatsoever.
All it does is offer different settings in double bind psychology. In other words the oppressive ideal can be completely & obviously corrupted such as ‘white fragility’ where the algorithm states outright that there is no debate against white racism. Or is more subtle in concealing the the entrapment factor.
Whichever way it goes 13 – that any of this has to do with ‘Marx’ et al is the absolutely epitome of james lindsays errors since its just a well baited place cell maze.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Place_cell
Marx et all is bait to have us all going around and around and around and around and around and around pointlessly chasing MARX ETCETCETCETCETCETC
When the problem is a machine learning issue that needs no historical influences and is NEURAL.
FEAR only Freud 13 and no others. But not because he was evil. Because those who are evil are using his design. It does not matter how such persons apply misanthropy with respect the Marx as hes not even in it & the entire problem can be described in a far more cohesive way. Including ( paradoxically ) how actual Marxists are nevertheless not actually activated by Marxism.
They beating to the tempo of an algorithm that needs no ‘Marx’ thus being one is irrelevant. You are a astronaut 13 whose not been to space & so am i. Thus our astronatage is fucking meaningless and in that respect so are marxists given thats no actual rocket to marx. The vehicle is using any method it likes because its developed all degrees of freedom. We FAIL any time we believe theres a specific method.
Its not easy to give up ‘marxing’ no. But we’d all be better off.
Place cell.
Thanks for the Ah-ha moment.
“Despite all my rage I am still just a rat in a cage.”
Speaking of power-and-control-seeking “religious” cults it could be said that the character featured here is the leader of such a cult.
http://godblesstheusabible.com
He is of course a religiously and culturally illiterate nihilistic barbarian
There is also this reference featuring his worse-than-awful son
http://wethepeoplebible.com
He is also effectively associated with this power-and-control-seeking project which is backed/financed by at least 72 deep-pocketed right-wing christian think tanks and propaganda factories. http://project2025.org
It has a 900 page closed detailed manifesto describing what it intends to do.
” Marxism is rooted in the false ideology that msn cannot change or redeem himself and is trapped forever in his state ”
Furthermore other forms of organised metaphysical atheist militia are just as off their trollies as the Marxist Atheists.
”Richard Dawkins and the new atheists suggest human consciousness can be cloned in a lab. But they can’t prove it ” Unquote.
Ahhhh Yesssss New Atheist METAPHYSICS !!!.
https://www.salon.com/2014/04/19/science_doesnt_disprove_god_where_richard_dawkins_and_new_atheists_go_wrong/
Unquote.
Thus MARXISM is also about insisting others must supply concrete falsifiable evidence
A marxist totalitarian can be recognised when they behave consistently as though EXEMPT.
I read a fair bit of this theosophy and could find anything even interesting or redeeming. It’s good not to be the only one. The Secret just smells of horse manure, but I guess that if you live on a farm, you can’t smell it after a time. Your expectations get lowered.
”I read a fair bit of this theosophy ”
Theosophy is among the utter codswhallops with its trance reader Bailey, its cosmic being ‘the Tibetan, its secret doctrines of Blavatsky etc etc. Personally i’m more confused as to why people cannot see that these things are just masonic money tree’s ? The boards if these things don’t actually believe a word of it, but they are archetypal fly traps for foolish minions who do & are daft enough leave their estates to it – no other meaning.
Spiritualism its arch rival it fell out with is identical in that respect & so is Gnosticism to a high degree.
New atheism is trying to get the same ball rolling with estate wealth being left to its fake heaven Humanism. The sort of metaphysics thats sprung into their tiny minds isn’t that different from contacting the Tibetan once they say stuff like this :
QUOTE :
(a) a metaphysical debate about what the universe contains; denying that it contains supernatural agencies of any kind makes him an atheist;
(b) a debate about the basis of ethics; taking the world to be a natural realm of natural law requires that humanity thinks for itself about the right and the good, based on our best understanding of human nature and the human condition; this makes him a humanist;
(c) a debate about the place of religious movements and organisations in the public domain; as a secularist Grayling argues that these should see themselves as civil society organisations on a par with trade unions and other NGOs, with every right to exist and to have their say, but no greater right than any other self-constituted, self-selected interest group.
UNQUOTE :
”A metaphysical debate about the contents of the universe” is a dead ringer for chatting with the Tibetan about it right ? Grayling & Dawkins actually take the hubris further inasmuch their trance link is the universe itself, not even a lower representative being. Again the new atheists state this extract :
”(a) a metaphysical debate about what the universe contains; denying that it contains supernatural agencies of any kind makes him an atheist;”
Thats not ‘Atheism’ its Pantheism.
Spiritualist – Gnostics – Theosophists – New Atheist Patheist Sophism ala Dawkins et al & via Humanism ..
They are all charlatans using the psychic trance reading / metaphysics in communication with the universe as confidence tricks & now even ‘Humanism’ is groping around hoping to inspire people to leave their houses to it.
“The Humanitarian with the Guillotine”
Isabel Paterson (from “The God of the Machine” 1943):
“Most of the harm in the world is done by good people, and not by accident, lapse, or omission. It is the result of their deliberate actions, long persevered in, which they hold to be motivated by high ideals toward virtuous ends.
The humanitarian wishes to be a prime mover in the lives of others. He cannot admit [that] men have the power to help themselves. The humanitarian is confronted by two awkward facts; first, that the competent do not need his assistance; and second, that the majority of people, if unperverted, positively do not want to be ‘done good’ by the humanitarian.
What the humanitarian actually proposes is that he shall do what he thinks is good for everybody. It is at this point that the humanitarian sets up the guillotine.
The humanitarian feels the utmost gratification when he visits or hears of a country in which everyone is restricted to ration cards. Where subsistence is doled out, the desideratum has been achieved, of general want and a superior power to ‘relieve’ it. The humanitarian in theory is the terrorist in action.”
“InHumanitarianism” by Andrew Cuff:
“The humanitarian society prioritizes comfort and desire over morality. Suffering is imagined as a problem to eliminate, rather than a form of meaning and potential source of growth. As a consequence, humanitarianism becomes increasingly aggressive as it confronts the frustrating truth about humanity.
The history of revolutionary movements tells the story of this cycle. The dark side of humanity is also part of the reality of human nature. Humanitarianism rejects reality in favor of delusional idealism, whose inevitable disillusionment leads to contempt for human beings. Humane societies, by contrast, grasp the nettle, and love man as he really is.”
I like it when I get the opportunity to apply Neo American Church (OKneoAC) principles to political arguments. Mr. Lindsay discusses the features of Marxist gnosticism, substantially demonstrating that what I have forever understood to be a political/economic system is also a Millenialist cult, with the Rapture/Revolution taking the form of a unification of dualism, our condition before our Fall into existence, the escape from which is always available though we have been conditioned as animals to assume a McPozzum existence. The problem is, however, that the illusion of duality is a necessary condition of being born into a body.
Marxism as cult confuses aspects (not “levels”) of our perception determined by existence in a body, “Snazzm, Fazzm, and McPozzum,” separate, distinct, incommensurate categories I cannot define here because it would take up too much space. Those interested can read about what I mean here: https://okneoac.org/dts/snazzm-fazzm-and-mcpozzm
Marxism as a Gnostic cult assumes Snazzm conditions–conditions that lead one to perceive and understand that life is literally a dream–but places them within a political context containing a scheme for bringing about the Millennium (McPozzum). The Fall, the Gnostic Demiurge, assumes a Fazzm reality, where the individual “soul””merges” or “becomes one” with the blob-like Gnostic/Buddhist “oversoul,” or God, for short.
Eastern religions, Marxism (evidently), gnosticism are Fazzm. The atheistic or mechanical worldview is McPozzum. The realization that one is (I am) the undifferentiated All beyond duality, that life is literally a dream, an illusion created by the (my) mind, is Snazzm.
These online forums illustrate the fact that I am at all times talking to myself in a dream and that these other individuals I interact with every day are creations of my mind and my mind is all there is. Pronouns are necessary to communicate this in English, which confuses matters quite a bit.
Anyway, any fellow Neo Americans out there? Victory over Horseshit!
”Mr. Lindsay discusses the features of Marxist gnosticism”
Your remarks about marxist reification seem very relevant.
IF we really had to secure a place within a secret religion ( i’m not sure we do ), then given the jesuit thus catholic schools tucked away around various alpine regions facilitate the sprogs of the NWO are far more likely to be it. Its like they go in these aged 1 and emerge fully trained to be dictators. Macron is even boning the old lady who taught him latin among catholicism’s most outer limits
The term ‘Atheist’ concerning what it means is a limited one. It really only describes the barest semiotic existentialist resolve = an atypicality compared to a theist & then its usefulness as a description ends. Because – no ‘Atheist’ can use atheism to disprove a God & thus naturally default ton Agnosticism.
However, rather like Robert Falcon Scott seems to some commentators to have ‘struggled with death’ once all was lost on his polar expedition so ( it appears ) does Richard Dawkins as he tried to prove that Atheist could use metaphysics to search the whole fucking universe!
My point is that rationally and logically speaking an ‘Agnostic’ that refuses not to ‘know’ because they demand we believe THEY DO KNOW …is surely thus
A Gnostic
= Richard Dawkins et al are Gnostics
That also makes JL one.
What a fucking mess.
Constructive though used to learn a language or a science or to cook a stew is the correct application of thought. Other thoughts are going to cause you to harm yourself and your well being.
Its not necessary to worry or be upset or angry. A sage would say..in fact one did say..” Do not pamper the Mind.” All is well and as it should be. One slowly becomes convinced that it is not productive to pursue thoughts that well up in the mind. Let them go…over and over again and we may reach the source of thoughts. At this time all mind worry drops off and the energy behind everything is revealed to be a power that operates in all things. These relatives of yours are tripping all over themselves like frantic, confused gnats without a grain of sense. And its terrible to hear about the in this condition. We can do nothing with a deranged person except watch them go berzerko and wear themselves out. I know that I know nothing and that makes me wise. Thus I can return to myself and watch the myriad things arise and subside. Trouble not thyself oh dear child. But you cant live without trouble as the absence of trouble will be the end of you as you think you have to be and you afraid that you will die. Cross the ravine if you dare!!!
May the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi embroider daffodils on your underpants.
And may the LSD of fatalism protect your innocence from anthrax attacks.
Om. Simply, Om.
Sorry. I couldn’t resist.
(Genuine appreciation of your kind intensions.)
”Sorry. I couldn’t resist”.
hehe – well there is sense and confluence in both Wards I Ching like remarks and the post where you questioned the sanity of logos. Both of you seem to know that whatever will be will be.
”These online forums illustrate the fact that I am at all times talking to myself in a dream and that these other individuals I interact with every day are creations of my mind and my mind is all there is.”
With the 1 of you or the 2 of you ?
If the latter is either of the ‘ones of you’ all there is ?
There’s a 1957 movie, based on a true story, called “Seven Waves Away” (aka “Abandon Ship”) in which survivors of a shipwreck in the middle of the ocean have one small lifeboat but too many people to fit in. The whole movie is the struggle to decide who stays in and who gets cut adrift. Madness ensues with moral hypocrisies, ethical posturing, cowardice and bullying giving way to brute survival of the fittest and savage murder.
I feel that this movie captures the current situation of the “anti-Woke movement”. It’s all starting to feel like Babel meets Bedlam. I confess to contributing to that cacophony to giddily let off steam to alleviate the exasperating desperation of being forced against my will to live in such an asphyxiating historical moment. My response to this impossible situation is to take a deep breath and place both feet flat on the floor to remind myself that no matter how hard my mind tries to escape into the ether of ego, there is always the physical reality of clay under my feet.
It’s time now to ask the one question that puts all of the epistemological, metaphysical and ontological bloviating (especially my own) into perspective: What does any of this have to do with the price of eggs?
Is any of this intellectually abstract theorizing (no matter how enlightening) actually helping real people in the real world deal with real problems that are demonstrably making their quotidian lived lives measurably more horrible? I think not. A line’s been crossed and now it feels like theory for theory’s sake is masking the horrifying reality of impending surrender to the Borg that’s advancing on the horizon.
Most human beings will acquiesce and adapt to any imposed control rather than risk rocking the boat of their own personal safety. For every individual ornery dissident who kicks against Social Credit’s Nanny State control, millions of others embrace authoritarian surveillance as nothing more than a way to remain in the lifeboat: to survive.
This will to survival at any cost makes most people do things they pretend in normal times that they could never sink to. Giving in then selling out then giving up then turning nasty. A horrible truth of human nature is that when people find themselves in a lifeboat situation, they will accept anything, do anything, throw anything — ethics, ideals, principles, morals, loved ones – overboard if it will help them survive amidst a chaos beyond their control.
This is the new unexplored frontier: Examining the baseness of human nature’s willingness to surrender to authoritarianism and documenting realistic ways to mitigate this reality for those of us who do not wish to surrender. This is the topic for the next phase of the anti-Woke discourse. Less talk. More walk. Before the lifeboat capsizes and drowns us all.
“Is any of this intellectually abstract theorizing (no matter how enlightening) actually helping real people in the real world deal with real problems that are demonstrably making their quotidian lived lives measurably more horrible? I think not. A line’s been crossed and now it feels like theory for theory’s sake is masking the horrifying reality of impending surrender to the Borg that’s advancing on the horizon.”
Theory is necessary in that it helps us understand the process unfolding, the process by which we are being enslaved, mentally to psychotic ideas and physically by having to engage with the forces of totalitarianism in real time at work, at school, in media.
It’s easy to get lost in the weeds and get the impression that one might be doing something more useful with one’s time, and we shouldn’t lose sight of the fact that actual change must occur. However, that change must be philosophically justifiable, not merely opposition and destruction for their own sake.
Buck up and fuck up totalitarians in any way you can. You only really need to read up on theoretical justifications once.
Thanks for the encouraging words.
A personal story of Woke: I’m an old man and have been at this anti-Woke struggle for a very long time (since the 1990s!) and often feel like the walls are closing in when Wokeness gets too personally close as it just did again recently with my sister’s three adult hyper-woke daughters (20s/30s all in university) who I’ve been distant with since 2016 when Woke took over their brains and when, rather than confront them at the time, I pretended my estrangement was because of my own mysterious aging gay personal issues, a pose adopted to please my sister who begged me not to cause her more problems with them (as a friend once asked me: how can such beautiful young women be such monsters?).
After avoiding them for years, I reached the breaking point recently after hearing of their latest woke shenanigans so I “came out” to them via email with a stinging critique of woke and truthfully implicated them which precipitated, as I long expected, cataclysmic hysterical tantrums to their mother: “OMG! He’s turned racist, fascist, transphobic, anti-native Indianist” (one’s bf is a native Indian so she’s gone full Cher ‘HalfBreed’ on her white family and says she wants to have “black and brown babies”). They ranted to their exhausted mother: “How can a cool gay artist, our own uncle, have become a Trump Nazi?!?” (we’re not even American — or German). My sister told me all this while tearfully admitting that I’ve been right about them all along and that she has finally accepted this ugly fact of her life and gave her OK for me to cut them out of my life for good without any more emotional flak from her. It’s all so sad: I took them all as teens on a trip to LA and while visiting the Museum of Death they declared that I was the coolest uncle in the world and now 15 years later I am Hitler. This is what Woke does in the real world and why I am sick to death of it at a cellular level.
Theory of course is critical to understanding. But theorizing doesn’t help when real people are going berserk with woke rage and splitting up families, friendships and careers (all three of which I’ve experienced as my personal Woke triumvirate of insanity). When my 96-year-old ill mother and final 20-year-old cat both die, I am pulling the internet plug and escaping into some off-grid hinterland of oblivion where Woke is never spoken and the deer and the antelope play. Mars sounds nice.
Marxism – the opium of intellectuals.
– Raymond Aron
Victor Zitta, in his book, Georg Lukács’ Marxism: Alienation, Dialectics, Revolution: A Study in Utopia and Ideology, on page 72, goes to the very heart of the psychopatholgy that is manifested in Marxism and all its protesting daughter variants.
He outlines 3 attributes- 1) alienation from the current reality; 2) overwhelming self-righteousness and 3) the willingess to pay any price (or to impose any cost on others) to achieve their vision of the perfect society.
That is just in the top paragraph. In the bottom paragraph on page 72, he observes that those with this Marxist world view seek to “immanitize” (or bring about immediately), the return of their savior, much like Christians who look for the Second Coming.
see: https://annas-archive.org/md5/cb53e81d3c3a1284afbead0640e596ca.
I have a terrible feeling matter are marching off into the abyss over the way X historical intellectual is named & shamed summarily & that is very sloppy. Surely better judgement concerning what their original motives of the intellectual matter with respect to today ?. Instead it is assumed that any old hijack & negative enforcement of say Marx / Hegel/ Derrida / so on must necessarily mean they were evil. Really that makes little sense, not withstanding the cases were it just IS evil @ conception. Otherwise in every case we are reacting to a revision thats moved key features around to suit their agenda. For instance if there were sufficient substance in a James work to do evil with it, his work would be flipped the 180 no problem . Such bad scholarship intent lacks nothing when it comes to the causation they seek & the designs used to obtain it. They’d understand X fully & i feel there would be remarkably few alterations.
There are modern dictatorships in plain sight getting away with all sorts of new reenactments of old work. Richard Dawkins will flagrantly lie to his audience just to monetised a video and his people have orgasms. For 20 years he has faked his arguments by stating he has the ‘scientific method’ on his side against creationists. Its actually Metaphysics via his pet philosopher where they’ve decided together THEY are so sure theres no GOD that remote viewing the cosmos can be referred to the scientific method if they like :
Quote :
Among his contributions to the discussion about religion in contemporary society he argues that there are three separable, though naturally connected debates:
(a) a metaphysical debate about what the universe contains; denying that it contains supernatural agencies of any kind makes him an atheist;
(b) a debate about the basis of ethics; taking the world to be a natural realm of natural law requires that humanity thinks for itself about the right and the good, based on our best understanding of human nature and the human condition; this makes him a humanist;
(c) a debate about the place of religious movements and organisations in the public domain; as a secularist Grayling argues that these should see themselves as civil society organisations on a par with trade unions and other NGOs, with every right to exist and to have their say, but no greater right than any other self-constituted, self-selected interest group.
Yes globalist Stakeholders@ the end there. Grayling was once a ‘fellow’ @ the WEF!! But then the entire new atheism edifice is bent and marxist. Really Dawkins acts like a sociopathic dictator who thinks he cannot bear to know that people believe in a God. Personally i see no real ‘evidence’ new atheism is against ‘religion’ . More that the org just provided the thought crime models that helped enable a looting process of the church of england, followed by slightly adapted version of thought crime attacking all free speech.
So whilst it is true that marxist pathology can lurk right before our eyes ( as above ), we also see it assigned a certain ‘mode’ a spread by mouth contagion became obsolete once the totalitarians had a neural like system i.e the web. Marxism is still in use, but has been considerably demoted by circumstance given it is still most useful ‘in person’ say through instrumental means. Thus with marxism shovelling the coal, Hegel and other binary editing exponents like Derrida & Saussure of is prioritised for an abuse of binaries.
Quote :
What is binary opposition de Saussure?
According to Ferdinand de Saussure, the binary opposition is the means by which the units of language have value or meaning; each unit is defined in reciprocal determination with another term, as in binary code. For instance, ‘hot’ gains meaning because of its relation to ‘cold,’ and vice versa.
So ‘Saussure’ usually cited as an enemy of reason ( perhaps he is ) – but that won’t be due to what he stated up there given it actually helps us understand what the globalists have done in order to form their post truth era.
I would say the enemy is Post Truth & its algorithms. This would mean that to name any one or few protagonists s total nonsense, given it appears to be so that this A.I. is selecting from any source it likes.
Is the Marx in the mix though – of course – and its mainly spread via local state / public sector workers. Most people have no clue about marxism & particularly the WOKE do not!
Other than this i have noticed time & time again that JL’s brain doesn’t process abstractions even though hes a math. There is no real debunking of the mystifications at large unless the abstractions they’ve used can be elucidated. What happens instead is that people unable to tackle such para consistent logics, resort to denying the purposes of them.
The globalists will run rings around us all unless what they are doing with para consistent logic is revealed. Why have they chosen post truth after all ?
Its the cheapest way to run a proletariat firstly given it has zero binary opposition. This can be thought of in terms of decided all speeders seen on CCTV are guilty theres No Debate. As disturbing and you cannot find evidence of it since ‘fact’ is not going to exist within logic based on none.
Thats why marxist spend so much time insisting on where the evidence is. And so ‘Totalitarianism’ is also defined by the way that state insists it is not right for a commoner to argue with the state given ‘TRUTH’ is only a ‘concept’ anyway ( far they are concerned ). The fact is ‘Truth’ can be reduced to the level of a mere concept should a misanthropic regime force that model & remove human rights to quality Justice. There are so many things we can pointlessly argue and metastasise whilst fumbling with the combination.
I sometimes wonder if James will stigmatise so many terms & phrases that none are left remaining & even this – HERE – = ND cult of sloppy cannot even speak anymore.
This whole spectacle of you as an atheist criticizing heresy from the point of view of a religion you don’t believe in but your base does…this is all insanity. Marxism is based on Judaeo Christian aka Zoroastrian apocalypticism, not on Gnosticism. That was Eric Voegelin’s Catholic fantasy, as if Gnosticism was nothing but apocalypticism. Gnosticism wants nothing to do with changing politics in this world. It is purely about a transformation of the soul. I understand that as a mathematician this is all new to you. Relying on Karl Popper to interpret Plato and Hegel is not a good strategy either. Popper was not at his best in that area.
commenter wrote: “Gnosticism wants nothing to do with changing politics in this world. It is purely about a transformation of the soul.”
“And the Devil did grin,
for his darling sin
is pride that apes humility.”
Samuel Taylor Coleridge
“The Devil’s Thoughts” 1799
”This whole spectacle of you as an atheist criticizing heresy”
The poor man is trying to wash off the oily bucket of albatross upchuck metaphysics which richard dawkins poured over him in the name of ‘science’. James cannot see that Dawkins is a partial ‘Claudine’ and his a very ordinary intellect. If that were not so Dawkins could never have conflated Metaphysic with the scientific method. Neither could Dawkins have felt inclined to run a 10 year attack on Agnosticism, when he should have know believers would one day have him for breakfast & he’d look a fool. He had to give agnostic answers the big questions but was shocked by finding himself there.
= Dawkins had no clue of those big cosmological questions otherwise he’d not have tried to disprove Agnosticism.
James still appears not to know that dreaming up Gnosticism by Metaphysics within a trance that has one professing to people concerning ‘LOGIC’ is bordering on demented.
And the cause is New Atheism.
The cure is to realise what a thick wanker Dawkins is.
>Marxism is based on Judaeo Christian aka Zoroastrian apocalypticism,
What are you smoking
Phew – thank goodness you posted this rubbish James.
From a format of honest reason and humility and genuine intellectual honesty these ideas would never stand up in a discourse or dialogue of open minded discussion. Soon the Marxists are exposed and their ideas are highlighted in contradiction from which they can not hide. This is why most are unable to adopt the religion as it reeks of something off and not logical.
So anyway we are knee deep in this shit as it is capturing over the institutions. The early bird gets the worm, that is how they operate with education. I can only venture they saw the schools as fertile ground to establish a base.
James, i am not down with the woke so dont misread me here. The ideas you are fighting arent marxist, they are probably more leninist.
I know it ultimately doesnt matter but you dig yourself into a hole when you get the details wrong of the opposing sides argument. It hurts your cause in the end because you miseducate one side, killing their credibility with the other, and then alienate the other who shut down immediately at the first incorrect detail.
Your strategy worsens polarization. You arent wrong overall that socialist systems dont work in most cases because they are riddled with slippery slopes. But this reactionary influencer scholarship technique you and others like you use is feeding the fire.
Theres got to be a better way. I dont know what it is but youre making yourself and everyone else crazy.
My radical professor proclaimed, “The role of academia is to redefine language to stay in control of the conversation.” This is exactly what you’re doing. He is not increasing polarization, and he is educating, not miseducating. Calling out this scourge by the name of “Marxism” isn’t killing anyone’s credibility. Anyone who has spent time on a college campus recently knows they call themselves “Marxists,” so don’t quibble with definitions.
Those who are on the side of the “Marxists” have absolutely no credibility, so even if your theory were valid, those educated by Dr. Lindsay would still have more credibility than their ideological opponents, even if one of the cultists identified itself as a “Leninist.”
The opposing side does not have a coherent argument anyway, as they follow the Frankfurt School which believes there can be no objectivity, only subjectivity. You can’t get the details “wrong” because they have no consolidated vision and cannot even agree amongst themselves whose tenets, exactly, they follow. It’s all just disjointed, illogical, mish-mashed manipulative bullshit masquerading as scholarship. Dr. Lindsay is demystifying it for the masses who have been hit unawares by this deluge. Don’t get in the way with any linguistic tricks and redefinitions. He’s doing an amazing job.
Sociologist,
Please clarify which you are referring to as rubbish: what James posted about Marxism, or Marxism itself. If the latter, yes, Marxism is rubbish. If the former, please explain where in his analysis James is mistaken about Marxism.
Col. Edward H. R. Green
See posts above. I’d already written that prior to nothing your remarks. Thus if you have any more requests let me know unless its an act of crypto fascism & james cock ups are considered ok there.
Btw i rarely read work by snide economists fully on board with the coudenhove kalergi plan such as you recommended last time.
Was that from cock up central also ?
Just saying.
Trying to read “Sociologist’s” babble is a waste of time and energy.
Michelle,
Frankfart School adherents tie themselves up in fallacious knots. Their assertion that there can be no objectivity only subjectivity includes itself. They are psychopathic/sociopathic solipsists.
‘They are psychopathic/sociopathic solipsists.’
You state lots of things you cannot back up don’t you. I also noticed a pattern in your behaviours.
The A.I. Algorithm the globalists are using is a frankfurt school based design nevertheless. However any negative effects are part of the specific Semiotics involved and the state of mind of such persons using the revisions.
Its YOU that has inferred those neuro diverse positions are involved. That perhaps – is since you’ve switched who / or / what has the broken minded pathology, perhaps from the algorithms designers to a well known historical school.
@Velma, you averred,
“You arent wrong overall that socialist systems dont work in most cases because they are riddled with slippery slopes.
Please define “work” as the concept applies to the context of socialism, and provide all of the irrefutable evidence of all of the cases in which socialism “works”.
“The ideas you are fighting arent marxist, they are probably more leninist.”
Leninism is, in essence, Marxism with Marx’s call for violence amplified. After the execution of his brother, Aleksandr Ilyich Ulyanov, Lenin was inspired by Nikolay Gavrilovich Chernyshevsky’s novel, “What is to be Done?” and used that title for his own pamphlet to rouse socialists to create an international vanguard of violent revolution to enslave and slaughter their “bourgeois” foes and create a socialist paradise.
There are four expressions of Statism: communism, socialism, fascism, and theocracy. They are all essentially based upon the denial of private property rights and, by logical necessity, the denial of all legitimate individual rights, including self-ownership and personal liberty and sovereignty. The woke agenda and its components, including CRT and Queer Theory, are just the latest tools “academics” and “intellectuals” have developed for the advancement and imposition of the socialist/communist expressions of Statism. Quibbling about details with Statists is unnecessary once one grasps Statism’s essence and goals, which is enslavement of all to psychopaths and sociopaths who “think” themselves entitled to rule, and to slaughter all dissidents to enforce it.
Hear, hear!
I think Mr. Lindsay’s analysis is both interesting and enlightening, and gives me a greater understanding of what I’m up against.
Sociologist, Velma, and ClearLight are either splitting hairs or complaining just for the sake of being contrary. I honestly cannot understand what Sociologist is going on about, even after a genuine effort to read it closely.
As you clearly put it, ‘Quibbling about details with Statists is unnecessary once one grasps Statism’s essence and goals, which is enslavement of all to psychopaths and sociopaths who “think” themselves entitled to rule, and to slaughter all dissidents to enforce it.’
” As you clearly put it, ‘Quibbling about details with Statists is unnecessary once one grasps Statism’s essence and goals, which is enslavement of all to psychopaths and sociopaths who “think” themselves entitled to rule, and to slaughter all dissidents to enforce it.’ ..
Hello COL.
Agreeing with yourself are you ?
Fuck Off you naughty little fascist infiltrator!
That message was to BOTH of you ONE Colonel’s.
in case your mind thinks, mine thinks, there’s two fascists at large.
NO – 1.
What exactly do you mean by statism?
Marxism is rooted in the false ideology that msn cannot change or redeem himself and is trapped forever in his state