New Discourses Bullets, Ep. 69
Struggle session season isn’t over. Even though we’re starting to understand what they are and how to deal with them, they’re still coming, sometimes with very high stakes. The point of a struggle session, ultimately, is to get you to confess to made-up crimes on contrived terms that you and others will adopt as a result of confessing. The hard truth of the struggle session is that there’s no coming back from capitulating to one. People can understand the pressures and the evil of the dynamic, but you still show yourself and those in your corner that under pressure you are faithless. Meanwhile, bystanders accept your confession as proof of your guilt, which not only places you in the category of criminal in their minds but also justifies the contrived terms upon which you were accused. Finally, your tormenter who is struggling you just knows they can break you, so they’ll continue to do so, mocking you that your confession wasn’t sincere enough. It’s losing all the way around. It’s bargaining away part of your soul for reprieve that you won’t really get. In this episode of New Discourses Bullets, host James Lindsay explains this hard truth of the struggle session and encourages you to stand up against them and to stand alongside people being put through them. Join him to understand and to strengthen your will.
Additional episodes of New Discourses Bullets can be found here.
Subscribe to New Discourses Bullets on SoundCloud, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, Pandora, YouTube, Rumble, Odysee or by RSS.
3 comments
My rights against theirs. My rights come from God or the the natural state of nature. REASON trumps faith or superstition. Where are these lunatics???
As well. theses sessions are unconstitutional. How they get away with this indoctrination and punishing people for committing no crime is not acceptable and an issue to be investigated by the courts. These institutions should be held accountable for violating people’s civil and constitutional rights. I hope that lawsuits will be served in huge numbers. Firing a worker for refusing to participate in clearly political activity is not a legal action.
Quote from above: “These institutions should be held accountable for violating people’s civil and constitutional rights. I hope that lawsuits will be served in huge numbers.”
Yes! I have been wondering this for some time now. Why does an employer have the right to make their employees go through some DEI-training session?
I am there to work, not undergo DEI-sessions that may be extremely damaging to individuals and interpersonal relationships.
What’s next, a climate-change session that talks about the environment? Or, a political-training session that provides advise on who to vote for if you want X, Y, or Z?
It’s all ridiculous, and I have wondered as well whether these DEI-training sessions can be stopped via the court of law. I think it might be interesting to investigate this possibility by a group of people well-versed in all of this.