New Discourses Bullets, Ep. 108
America is at a crossroads, and how it chooses may affect the fate of the entire world. Though there are different ways to conceive of the choice that lies before us, one is that we will have to choose between catharsis and civilization. It’s unlikely we can have both, so this choice is incredibly important and deadly serious. If we choose catharsis, a sweet release of all our anger and frustration from the oppression and chaos of Woke Marxism, we will likely upset the balance required to maintain our civilization. If we choose civilization, we will have a real chance of climbing out of this, but we’ll also have to swallow many of our feelings and restrain ourselves against our passions. In this episode of New Discourses Bullets, host James Lindsay offers a short introduction to this choice. Join him in choosing well.
Additional episodes of New Discourses Bullets can be found here.
Subscribe to New Discourses Bullets on SoundCloud, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, Pandora, YouTube, Rumble, Odysee or by RSS.
7 comments
Dear James = PPS
Other than the critique in my several posts thank you for the best bullets for years. It does say what is needed neatly and sweetly well done. Can you lead it on without attacking people better educated & who’ll employ the strongest & most convincing of the frankfurt schools knowledge. Well you know what i think about that. That is in the lap of the godless universe, if you are taking funding from quango’s who are contracted to crush revivalist activity. People who throw sticks for you to retrieve James / and yet you run a revival site ! (so fucked up).
lol its an almost cosmological level amusing i’ll grant it. But why don’t you three consider not doing that ? Genius with GS no doubt that was amazing – the rest is absolute sht interspersed with the odd golden cognition burger. I hope you see the gross errors your cohort have made James i really do.
Dear James
This is a quality piece that breaks a cycle, about two years long or more, throughout which you’ve been so utterly meaningless. For two r maybe three years you’ve forever repeated repeated repeated merely that the problems are caused by woke Marxism // never stating how // never deconstructing it // never providing the forward philosophy. BLAH BAH BLAH ITS WOKE MARXIS BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH ITS WOKE MARXISM. You are a parrot that should have been let out of your cage at a pheasant shoot by now, your featherage used to tickle richard dawkins silly BLX! So now you want to employ REASON ? How are you going to do that ? You’ve just run an elaborate wild goose chase attempting to socially engineer your readers to ignore the basis of REASON you must now adopt.
1 – You do not understand the Frankfurt School
2 – You are unable to tell the difference between work that moved the masses & the negative revisions by the elites that altered it.
3 – In other words you have no ability to distinguish literary Innocence from the sociological fatality that occurs when great humanitarian work is hijacked and corrupted via Statism.
4 – You are a typical casualty of natural selection with Metacognition. You feel selection nausea and become confused by the inner conflict that natural selection throws up in minds. You choose the soft options that inject hormones giving senses of elation. It doesn’t work like that James – the hard choices as an intelectual cause negative feelings & we must learn to cope with that certain sicky feeling NS uses to hold us back = YOU FAIL.
Probably because that famous evolutionist you and bogtart love to visit in Over Norton is clearly so slimmed ( and stupid ) that he can hardly sit still on a chair, so much does he wiggle his bum in adrenal excitement. You new atheists are idiots don’t you know ? This is your last chance as after this i’m going to class you are a robot without knowledge of the way the elite is using it. Ok you’ve a mountain to climb & paradoxically your lightweight mind wont hp you up there. You are now talking about taking a psychiatric outlook with respect to the mass consciousness of humanity. So who knew ? – not YOU i don’t think James.
But look. At least you’ve reach the stage where you’ve realised that messages, that have been designed to move minds one by one ( like yours have ) – are pointless. ALL of New Discourses – has spent its time speaking to its audience as if its one hemisphere of james lindsays brain trying to convince the other hemisphere of james lindsays brain. In other words – by reading your material ( and abrahamic god knows i class you as a lab rat & i’ve read a lot of it ) – its clear that EVEN YOU are not convinced of what you have been saying, You only discuss from and to ( i.e in the audience ) an area of mind thats got conscious bias with which to generate ideas. Thus your material is only received by your audiences conscious bias. Its constructed in the form of rhetoric thats too shallow to invoke or instil the existential spirit within uncorrupted humanity. ‘Woke Marxism’ as you call it ( Neo Marxism whatever // its not Marxism thats the certainty ) is hacking into the unconscious and instilling a sense ‘righteousness’ into cognitive bias. Worthy of note here is that the elite social engineering ie that theres an unconscious bias & its how white people do racism etc is impossible, we have no control over the metacognitive processes of the unconscious & thus must refine the conscious bias in order to alter our inner sanctity. We must convinced of conscious mind we stand for X / Y / Z / so that our automated unconscious motives do.
You class yourself as an expert on these subjects . but the trouble is you could not be more of a fucking nuisance. Clueless. THE WORLD HAS KNOWN FOR COUNTLESS DECADES THERES A CORRUPTION OF THE WORK OF MARX YOU TWIT!!
FFS sort yourselves out – Bogtart – Phuckknows – Wind say.
Take the time to learn what actually happened with the frankfurt school even if its too big to read. Right now you’ve no clue what happened there. What you need to know is who tried to behave like YOU are trying to behave NOW – only for their work to be re-written and their name used to commit corruption. THE VERY LEAST you need to understand is who set out, innocently to try save the world and FAILED because elites appropriated their work. You idea ( here ) is far from unique so much so theres people all ver the globe trying t organise such. Most of them will reconstruct the elements of the frankfurt school that work. THUS – according t the way you people are maladjusted, you people will start a counter revolution against other people trying to do what you’ve suggested here.
As i stated lots of time. New Atheism is a social engineering lab that designed an anti religion based thought crime for what you ( Lindsay et al ) say is Woke Marxism. IT CAME FROM YOUR VERY OWN INTELLECTUAL HQ – well – the one that influences ( True ) & i suspect funds you * ( * I do not know but reasonable suspect thats how new discourses is controlled by new atheism puppet masters )
You are trying to talk abut an intellectual counter revolution from that standpoint ?
With the greatest of respect as i do admire you and can see you fight fight fight. But you no idea how to considering the corrupted and i dare say weedy knowhow new atheism inflicted upon you. . So FO Lindsay. Maybe you might come back in about 10 years after you learned the ropes before trying that. You might kick that sick treacherous intellectually perverted monster from over norton up the arse as a warning to his habit of getting off on hormonal style anal thinking then throw him into that slave owner ancestral stench pit of his.
Staying civilized is the only way. For the woke and revolutionary progressives aim is to bring down being civilized. And have only there Ideas that all have to submit to. They want to eliminate the neutral ground that all stand on in being civilized.
”Staying civilized is the only way”
Yes. It will therefore be interesting to hear what New Atheism HQ has ordered lindsay to say about this.
HQ in attached = do smell a rat. My only curiousity is whether bogtart / phckknows & windsay know they are being played // and if so are they blinded that way by funding from HQ. Considering new atheism models crushed christianity & the same models are now crushing ALL PEOPLE its reasonable to wonder if new atheism is a secretly funded quango, by officialdom, behind the backs of everyone. If so is a pervasive professional source of the neo marxist toxin.
Yes that would mean they have control of whats allowed to be stated on this site. In turn that would mean this site is ‘redacted’. IF CORRECT. If at all true i do not feel by the owners design, i’d tend to wonder were they lured into that position by the charisma and the rewards package under the delusion that new atheism didn’t design the modern 21 century revision of thought crime. <<< THAT new atheism certainly did
So the suspicion is reasonable enough, though could be non factual / or argue that way as its possible they just are too stupid to know. Even then its not a bad thing as good clever decent people can just not realised such things. If its doing so – New Atheism should not be a bent quango sucking up public funds.
Doh!kins is mad enough to contemplate the cosmologically sized logical explosion of a blasphemy law again new atheism. Thats how much that – thing – is a fake intellectual.
The systems that at one point that were functioning should be brought back on line to make sure the guilty get what they deserve. Damn right we are angry and we have a right to feel that way, many evil things happened and are happening to us right now and started way before 2020 but that was the catalyst. Justice be served. This can be done without blue hair without nose clamps and without an onslaught hitting the airwaves and social media, but damn it must be done to satisfy the thirst of the hurt, maimed and for some not with us because of what was done to us on purpose. We can get this country back and do it without being woke and that is a good thing.
Thank you for your words. I love listening to your stuff. But… we need accountability, we need constitutional justice. We cannot move forward in any clean way without it. Holding people accountable is not about allowing to go wild our unrestrained passions; rather, it’s about making sure the controllers and their minions understand what & who we, the citizenry, are. The sadists do not fear us. They need a little tutoring in this area.
Dear Loren
We are listerning to a call for collective emotional intelligence from a spokesperson whose greatest influence is new atheism / richard dawkins et all. An organisation which without a shadow of a doubt rebooted medieval thought crime in the style of mathew hopkins, obtained a public consensus for it, and used it to destroy christianity just so a separate abrahamic religion could take its place. It does not appear that new atheism had any bone fide intent concerning anti religion thus, – they were interested in how an brutal ancient terrorist psychology could be repurposed to placed the public in an oppressed state in the 21 century. If you observe the 20 odd years of pressure the new atheism argument placed on christianity, something very simple becomes apparent. Western governments have used exactly the same model against ALL PEOPLE.
Lindsay et al have ( at least in the past / fair recently ) been closely involved with the laboratory that very much seems to have designed either all, or much of the modern Neo Marxism in question.
If so – i feel they didn’t know / have not had the intellectual capacity to decode this in house dilemma. I also wonder whether New Atheism HQ has all or some on them of roll & is dictating to them what to think and say due to the way it is new atheism that did this to the UK / Europe / USA. Not anywhere like completely. Freaks of elite nature are more than capable and have been screwing with the world since WW2. Nevertheless New Atheism does appear to be a secret quango, i,e a outer non official ministry funded by official sources and taking the kind of decisions ( philosophical ones ) that affect entire nations.
Funding of that type tends to be highly addictive.
” I’m in London / going off to visit Richard tomorrow James ”
( Bogtart to Wind say about a year ago in a video )
I wonder if Peter got any sense out of Dawkins that day, or as it just further ORDERS concerning what salient research & news material to AVOID.