New Discourses Bullets, Ep. 107
Queer Theory, which is to say Queer Marxism, is a religious cult, as discussed at length in The Queering of the American Child. So what’s the role of the drag queen in this cult? While much has been said on this issue to clarify for people that the drag queen in the presence of children is meant to be the purveyor of an initiation rite into Queer Marxism for the kids, a clear explanation of why they’re chosen would be of use. In this episode of New Discourses Bullets, host James Lindsay provides the explanation as it is rooted in Judith Butler’s Queer Theory: drag queens are the enlightened priest class who understand that gender is an oppressive performance that can be parodied, disrupted, and deconstructed. Join him to gain greater depth of understanding of this grotesque cult activity.
Additional episodes of New Discourses Bullets can be found here.
Subscribe to New Discourses Bullets on SoundCloud, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, Pandora, YouTube, Rumble, Odysee or by RSS.
6 comments
All of the previous five comments are written by the same woke right nutcase aren’t they? Are they really that obvious? If so then I guess they don’t present that much of a threat after all..
Since you’ve decided to visit the sick ontology of the likes Butler / Lacan / Derrida you might make up your mind what chickens you stand for & what eggs you don’t James. Your attack indiscriminately usually, and its worth noting that structuralism’s exponents believed it had replaced Phenomenology. At least with that there was a strict preservation of binary oppositions in phenomenology.
As i said make up your mind before you attack P to spite S and look a fool – if so even sounding like derrida yourself in doing so. Your frequently sneered at phenomenology as if it had something to do with queer – NO.
Even the early forms of Aphrodite’s image and her cult at Corinth are worth considering https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/ce/Hermaphroditus_%28herma%29.jpg/155px-Hermaphroditus_%28herma%29.jpg how old this idea of ‘queer priests’ has existed for. Similarly, the cult of Kybele and Attis and the self-emasculation of ritual participants to become temple priests.
Drag priests are essentially no different from other priests–and politicians (secular priests?)– in that they seek to inculcate children with propaganda because children have not yet developed maturationally, intellectually, and educationally to be capable of critically, objectively examining and refuting it. Like other priests, they seek to groom children–and child-minded adults–in order to exploit and enslave them.
Gender/sex may be performatively parodied, critically deconstructed, and disrupted by hormone injections and surgery, but it cannot be metaphysically transformed at the biological/chromosomal level from one to the other. In accord with Aristotle’s Law of Identity, A continues to be A.
Ok we are all drag so the important thing then is we deliberately display what are biology is. Because that is an undeniable known truth. The compass for guidance. The direction to freedom from doubt and turmoil