New Discourses New Discourses
  • Home
  • ND Podcast
  • ND Bullets
  • OnlySubs Podcast
  • SJ Encyclopedia
  • Grievance Studies
  • Consulting
  • Books
  • Merch
0
0
175K
0
0

Support This Work

Subscribe

About

Contact

Events

Articles

Videos

Audio

FAQ

Tags
academia america antiwoke audio bullets communism Critical Pedagogy Critical Race Theory critical social justice Critical Theory education encyclopedia gender glossary helen pluckrose herbert marcuse history Ideology James Lindsay karl marx marxism members only ND Bullets nd podcast neo-marxism new discourses onlysubs philosophy podcast politics postmodernism Queer Theory race racism religion schools social justice social justice dictionary terms tftw translations from the wokish woke woke marxism wokeness wokish
  • About
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Audio
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Support This Work
  • FAQ
Subscribe
New Discourses New Discourses

Pursuing the light of objective truth in subjective darkness.

New Discourses New Discourses
  • Home
  • ND Podcast
  • ND Bullets
  • OnlySubs Podcast
  • SJ Encyclopedia
  • Grievance Studies
  • Consulting
  • Books
  • Merch
  • Audio

The Need for Linguistic Discipline

  • January 11, 2024
  • New Discourses
Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0

New Discourses Bullets, Ep. 78

Woke Marxists overwhelmingly take advantage of malicious language games. That means you cannot be linguistically lazy when trying to deal with their incursions. We have to start cultivating a habit of linguistic discipline to take apart Woke word magic. In this episode of New Discourses Bullets, host James Lindsay explains the need for linguistic discipline with several important examples. Join him to start training.

Additional episodes of New Discourses Bullets can be found here.

Subscribe to New Discourses Bullets on SoundCloud, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, Pandora, YouTube, Rumble, Odysee or by RSS.

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
New Discourses

Administrator for NewDiscourses.com

Related Topics
  • audio
  • critical thinking
  • Discourse
  • episode
  • Examples
  • Habits
  • Ideology Analysis
  • Incursions
  • James Lindsay
  • Linguistic Awareness
  • Linguistic Discipline
  • ND Bullets
  • Ndbullets
  • new discourses
  • New Discourses Bullets
  • podcast
  • training
  • woke
  • woke marxists
  • wokeness
  • wokish
  • Word Magic
Previous Article
fascism
  • Audio

Fascism: Idolatry of the State

  • January 8, 2024
  • New Discourses
View Post
Next Article
Pendulum
  • Audio

Understanding Reflexive Environments

  • January 18, 2024
  • New Discourses
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Audio

Communism Is Not Atheist

  • New Discourses
  • June 23, 2025
Pendulum
View Post
  • Audio

How Woke Uses Political Warfare as Intelligence Operations

  • New Discourses
  • June 19, 2025
View Post
  • Audio

OnlySubs: Woke Right Elitism and Curtis Yarvin’s Dark Elves

  • James Lindsay
  • June 17, 2025
View Post
  • Audio

The Nazi Experiment, Vol. 1: The Nazi Racial Worldview

  • New Discourses
  • June 13, 2025
Pendulum
View Post
  • Audio

Exposing the MAGA Civil War

  • New Discourses
  • June 5, 2025
View Post
  • Audio

OnlySubs: The Surprising Genius of “Woke Right”

  • James Lindsay
  • May 30, 2025
View Post
  • Articles
  • Audio

The Woke Right’s Elitist Coup: Inside the MAGA Civil War

  • James Lindsay
  • May 23, 2025
View Post
  • Audio

Woke Right: MAGA’s “New Atheists”?

  • New Discourses
  • May 19, 2025
8 comments
  1. Herr Schütze says:
    June 3, 2024 at 5:42 pm

    See: https://knowthyself.forumotion.net/t2377p360-pagan-religion#112499

    Reply
  2. Larry Cox says:
    January 12, 2024 at 10:47 pm

    I see many commentators engage in “sloppy” verbalizations, overly idiomatic or suggestive language, or juvenile patterns like mockery or flippant but dismissive brush offs. This indicates to me that they have not grasped something in the material they are dealing with, to the point where they are unable to take it seriously. You can only truly laugh at an idiocy if you really understand what it means.

    This ties into what James is talking about. I would council that if someone is piling a bunch of language on you that you don’t understand or that doesn’t communicate, just laugh quietly and skip it.

    I had a guy on a bus today walk up to me and start talking about “Koreans.” He was obviously in a poor mental state, and what he was saying was largely understandable. I had the choice of earnistly trying to understand him, or basically ignore him. He didn’t seem to be too upset about being ignored. This is probably his most common experience.

    It’s sad, because the being approaching you obviousl desires some sort of personal interaction. But if the guy has a knife or gun in his hand, or is speaking in nonsense syllables, it is probably better to leave him alone to dramatize in the company of his own secret demons.

    I don’t think we should have any delusions that we are dealing with quite sick people. They may appear “normal” and perfectly capable of having a serious discussion. But if they talk like this, chances are they really aren’t.

    Reply
    1. Larry Cox says:
      January 12, 2024 at 10:49 pm

      I missed a word above… what the man was saying was largely NOT understandable…

      Reply
  3. Rob says:
    January 12, 2024 at 4:38 am

    Dominant muslim communities (≥ 5% of total population) in otherwise secular societies employ similar tactics. The secular, after a while get to “know” what all kinds of religious terms and theories mean but only to the extent wanted by the muslim community.

    Reply
  4. Jorgensen Shmorgensen says:
    January 11, 2024 at 5:34 pm

    “Pretend the word ‘gender’ is a bad word that you wouldn’t say in public.”

    THANK YOU! Every human is one of two possible SEXES: male SEX or female SEX. To all humans who ever existed, the biological reality of human male SEX (penis bearing) or human female SEX (vagina bearing) is as natural to the species as the physical reality of breathing air and drinking water. Any human characteristic described as “gender” is psychiatric illness projection, plastic surgery mutilation rationalization, cult ritual indoctrination dogma and Leftist political warfare strategy.

    In the early 2000s, a woman pretending to be a man, “human rights” lawyer Shannon Minter (still a bearded lady in 2024) bragged in “queer” online forums about her “work” to subvert legal and legislative documents by simply substituting the word “gender” wherever the word “sex” appeared. She bragged that no one noticed and those who did were silenced as “fascist”. This woman is still running amok in the US government, but I will never forget the malicious glee she took in describing how easy it was to use this simple language trick to systemically sabotage (to “Queer”) US laws and legislation to eradicate 200 years of human SEX definitions so that queered men could legally pretend to be “women” (and vice versa). And her trick worked.

    James Lindsay is correct: The Woke Master’s tools will never dismantle the Woke Master’s house.

    REFUSE THEIR LANGUAGE!
    RESIST THEIR TYRANNY!

    VIVA LA COUNTER-REVOLUCION!

    FREE HUMANITY FROM WOKE!
    WE HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE BUT THEIR CHAINS!

    Reply
    1. Anonymous says:
      January 13, 2024 at 5:32 am

      Quote from above: ” Any human characteristic described as “gender” is psychiatric illness projection, plastic surgery mutilation rationalization, cult ritual indoctrination dogma and Leftist political warfare strategy. ”

      What I don’t understand is sentences like “When a baby is born, the doctor makes a guess what gender this baby is by saying it’s a baby boy or a baby girl”.

      Uhm, do some people really think that? Even in their own interpretation of words like “biological sex” and “gender”.

      What’s more likely, that the doctor uses the words “boy” and “girl” to refer to the biological sex of the baby, or that the doctor uses the words “boy” and “girl” to say something that according to some people can not be determined by looking at physical characteristics, and can change, and develop over time, and has way more than two options?

      Reply
      1. Anonymous says:
        January 13, 2024 at 5:39 am

        I think the absurdity of this reasoning might become apparent to even the most stubborn of folks by advocating that doctors should employ more than the two options “boy” or “girl” when saying something about the baby’s gender and/or biological sex (depending on what you think the doctor might be talking about).

        Or advocating that doctors can’t really know the gender and they would just be guessing, so they should not say anything at all about the gender! The may however say something about the biological sex. Then doctors could all say that that’s what they will do from now on , by using the word “boy” to refer to “a male child” and by using the word “girl” to refer to “a female child”.

        I think either of these would make some thing clear.

        Reply
        1. Anonymous says:
          January 15, 2024 at 4:56 am

          Quote from above: “I think either of these would make some thing clear.”

          I wonder whether it would be possible and useful to try and come up with a few of these replies to counter the “script” certain people may have running in their brains (e.g. due to listening to college professors talk nonsense). It think this might be very useful because it might show holes in the “script”, and might cause “malfunction” of running the script in their brain.

          That in turn might cause the person to break from the automatic, programmed, “script” mode and engage in more rational thought, and reasoning because they will have to somehow respond to the introduction of the new “script”. I reason this may not necessarily immediately result in a useful and/or rational conversation, but I think this might be a useful step in breaking the possible automatic, programmed, “script”.

          I hope “NewDiscourses” will ponder (should they not have done this already) whether this 1) possibly makes sense, and 2) whether a few of these new replies or counter “scripts” concerning often mentioned “scripts” by some people could be thought of and collected and depicted on this website.

          Just like there is a “SJ Encyclopedia” currently on this website, there could be a set of “replies” to certain often mentioned thoughts, reasoning, or “scripts” that people could use to counter stuff. That in turn could be a useful experiment to see what that might lead to.

          Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Support This Work

Follow Us



Recent Posts
  • A Beginner’s Guide to the Woke Right
  • Communism Is Not Atheist
  • How Woke Uses Political Warfare as Intelligence Operations
  • OnlySubs: Woke Right Elitism and Curtis Yarvin’s Dark Elves
  • The Nazi Experiment, Vol. 1: The Nazi Racial Worldview

Recent Comments
  • Miles R. on A Beginner’s Guide to the Woke Right
  • James Solbakken on A Beginner’s Guide to the Woke Right
  • gmmay on A Beginner’s Guide to the Woke Right
  • William Vojtech on A Beginner’s Guide to the Woke Right
  • JungAtHeart on Whiteness

Tags
academia america antiwoke audio bullets communism Critical Pedagogy Critical Race Theory critical social justice Critical Theory education encyclopedia gender glossary helen pluckrose herbert marcuse history Ideology James Lindsay karl marx marxism members only ND Bullets nd podcast neo-marxism new discourses onlysubs philosophy podcast politics postmodernism Queer Theory race racism religion schools social justice social justice dictionary terms tftw translations from the wokish woke woke marxism wokeness wokish
ND Banner Image for sidebar copy
ND Banner Image for sidebar copy
ND Banner Image for sidebar copy
book ad v 2
3x2-Promo-copy
Social
Twitter 0
Instagram 0
YouTube 175K
Facebook 0
SoundCloud 0
Subscribe
New Discourses
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact
© 2025 New Discourses. All Rights Reserved.

Input your search keywords and press Enter.