New Discourses Bullets, Ep. 53
When you understand that virtually everything with Woke Marxism is (a) impossible and (b) a strategic provocation, it leads you to think about engaging with it differently. (And engage with it we must!) A powerful technique for breaking free of Woke magic spells and manipulation is simply to take a step back and name the dynamic. This is a powerful technique from mediation and negotiation that can break through many stuck situations, but it’s crucially important to understand how it must be applied to defeat dialectical traps and advances from the Woke. Join host James Lindsay for this episode of New Discourses Bullets to understand it.
Additional episodes of New Discourses Bullets can be found here.
Subscribe to New Discourses Bullets on SoundCloud, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, YouTube, Rumble, Odysee or by RSS.
7 comments
The key word here is ” agitator”.
In Scientology we have eight dynamics: Self; Sex and Children; Groups; Mankind (Species); Life Forms; the physical; the spiritual; the infinite.
I don’t see the word used much in ordinary speech, at least not as a noun.
How does this word apply to this mechanism of conceptual traps? Well, it’s a sort of dynamic, isn’t it? Dynamic in the sense of a pattern of social interaction. So James is asking us to detect this pattern and call it out. I have done this occasionally with people going a little crazy in my presence and it usually results in the person shutting up. If they are being kooky, it can be quite satisfying.
The usual form I see this used in is: “I’m not interested in playing your game.”
Muchas gracias James
Kills feminized discourse as well. Only a portion of wokies are actual academics or tRainEd MarXIsts. Most are emo teenagers in adult bodies who argue as housewives do: reputation destruction, innuendo, passive aggression. When a Southern woman tells you, “You aaaalways look so nice in that sweater,” she really means you’re a financial failure who wears the same out-of-fashion clothes all the time. Try asking repeatedly in a very calm, quizzical tone, “What does that mean? Why did you say always?” It always leads to squirming, blushing and eventual retreat. Same dynamic occurs when screeching college students start flapping their lips about “actual harm,” or when smug boomers ask why it’s so terrible to “step back and allow marginalized groups to step into the room first.” This snakelike innuendo is a key part of their technique.
It’s just SO Refreshing to have heroes like yourself James, so well versed in the Woke Marxist Ideology that you can dismantle it for us and help us form the ‘Rebel Alliance’ that is needed to overthrow them 🙏
Very good analogies here.
The left is clearly not engaged in the process of reasoned debate. For that reason, it is much easier for them and probably even a lot more entertaining. All they need to do is cut and paste a few talking points and then misinterpret your words to make them seem as terrible as they can.
I don’t think most of them are even conscious that they are doing that though. I think they just mimic what they see from others that seem to be on their “team”.
You need to make merch with your self description:
Pro+America. Anti-Communist. Based AF.