New Discourses Bullets, Ep. 13
Klaus Schwab is the Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum, which openly seeks to remake the world and its economies into a “stakeholder” model of his own creation. In his 2022 book, The Great Narrative for a Better Future, Schwab explains that the existing “shareholder”-based social contract has expired, and it’s time for a new one. In this episode of New Discourses Bullets, host James Lindsay walks you through a few paragraphs of The Great Narrative in which Schwab details what a new social contract would entail and where it might come from. Join him to see what Schwab has in mind.
Additional episodes of New Discourses Bullets may be found here.
Subscribe to New Discourses Bullets on SoundCloud, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, YouTube, or by RSS.
3 comments
The genesis of Schawb’s WEF Ruling Elite is found in the writing of Auguste Comte circa 1822 – see paragraph 4 below for a terrifyingly literal definition of Schwab’s New World Order, which has been iteratively evolving since the French Revolution and after 225 years the Machiavellian/gnostic plan is finally coming to totalitarian fruition.
from: Albert Camus “The Rebel” 1956; chapter: “State Terrorism and Rational Terror; The Bourgeois Prophecy”
“[Auguste] Comte’s primary aim [circa 1822], which was to substitute everywhere the relative for the absolute, was quickly transformed… into the deification of the relative and into preaching a religion that is both universal and without transcendence.
Comte saw in the Jacobin cult of Reason an anticipation of positivism and considered himself, with perfect justification, as the real successor of the revolutionaries of 1789. He continued and enlarged the scope of this revolution by suppressing the transcendence of principles and by systematically founding the religion of the species… We know that he wanted to see in all the cathedrals ‘the statue of deified humanity on the former altar of God.’
…[T]he religion of humanity was effectively preached toward the end of the nineteenth century, and Marx… was one of its prophets. Marx only understood that a religion which did not embrace transcendence should properly be called politics. Comte knew it too, after all, or at least he understood that his religion was primarily a form of social idolatry and that it implied political realism, the negation of individual rights, and the establishment of despotism.
A society whose experts would be priests, two thousand bankers and technicians ruling over a Europe of one hundred and twenty million inhabitants where private life would be absolutely identified with public life, where absolute obedience ‘of action, of thought, and of feeling’ would be given to the high priest who would reign over everything, such was Comte’s Utopia, which announces what might be called the horizontal religions of our times.
It is true that it is Utopian because, convinced of the enlightening powers of science, Comte forgot to provide a police force. Others will be more practical; the religion of humanity will be effectively founded on the blood and suffering of humanity.”
from Camus ‘The Rebel’ 1956
“[I]n a lecture at the Sverdlov University… Lenin spoke with a precision which left little doubt about the indefinite continuation of the proletarian super-State.
‘With this machine, or rather this weapon (the State), we shall crush every form of exploitation, and when there are no longer any possibilities of exploitation left on earth, no more people owning land or factories, no more people gorging themselves under the eyes of others who are starving, when such things become impossible, then and only then shall we cast this machine aside. Then there will be neither State nor exploitation.’
Therefore as long as there exists on earth, and no longer in a specific society, one single oppressed person and one proprietor, so long the State will continue to exist. It also will be obliged to increase in strength during this period so as to vanquish one by one the injustices, the governments responsible for injustice, the obstinately bourgeois nations, and the people who are blind to their own interests. And when, on an earth that has finally been subdued and purged of enemies, the final iniquity shall have been drowned in the blood of the just and the unjust, then the State, which has reached the limit of all power, a monstrous idol covering the entire earth, will be discreetly absorbed into the silent city of Justice.
Under the easily predictable pressure of adverse imperialism, the imperialism of justice was born, in reality, with Lenin. But imperialism, even the imperialism of justice, has no other end but defeat or world empire. Until then it has no other means but injustice. From now on, the doctrine is definitively identified with the prophecy. For the sake of justice in the far-away future, it authorizes injustice throughout the entire course of history and becomes the type of mystification which Lenin detested more than anything else in the world. It contrives the acceptance of injustice, crime, and falsehood by the promise of a miracle.
Still greater production, still more power, uninterrupted labor, incessant suffering, permanent war, and then a moment will come when universal bondage in the totalitarian empire will be miraculously changed into its opposite: free leisure in a universal republic. Pseudo-revolutionary mystification has now acquired a formula: all freedom must be crushed in order to conquer the empire, and one day the empire will be the equivalent of freedom. And so the way to unity passes through totality.”
It’s picture that of a boot stamping on the human face.FOREVER.