OnlySubs: They’re Not Idiots

4 comments

1. Completely agree with all remarks that warn of the sophistication that is involved when it concerns the malicious strains social engineering at large.

   Would add that the resultant woke army is best considered in the phenomenological sense, i.e what its singular voice & actions are effective with en masse. Whilst local experiences with woke, or singular activisms may reflect the whole state, it shall always be the entire quantisation that the manipulation addresses. For example any subset of activist bodies will themselves respond chiefly to the synthesis the social engineers have put sociologically – in the labs they’d only perceive 1 entity which thy are manipulating, one brain almost.. This is since there will be no explicit instructions on activist level – the first line that will receive that strain of information would be the major spin doctors.

   This forms part of the reason why the woke design was ever developed into a viral contagion. Thus had to have the ability to become a societal form of aphrodisiac, which excited persons consciously, ice a way of conforming, but also excitement with going forward in life – prospects – promotion and so on. At the same time its doctrines clearly demonstrate artefacts that are designed to constantly insert fear that’ll bypass conscious thought. his is why there is a concentration of debunking Freud among the post structuralists et al. It is rather ironic that sigmund should become one of the most useful tools of logic as of now But that i’d swear is so, as the social engineers have tried to deflect everyone away from realisations concerning how there trusted these diseases via unconscious fear – Unconscious Bias & its deluded science is one of those defence mechanisms

   it had to have the ability to seat fear in the unconscious mind – the purely societal virus would not have completed the manipulation since it isn’t that segment of the contagion that the ongoing sociological wind ups manipulate. To that effect, i would say that the central flaw in woke is that 99% ( of persons that will have been low achievers in any case ) only think they’ll do all in life ( as a conscious mind drive ) – and ofc won’t. Then there is a unconscious feedback thats been loaded with suggestions that the only reason that can fail is due to X type of person keeping them down. It isn’t the reason, the establishments created no opportunities therefore have invented Woke instead.

   Some may disagree that the drives are this simple. I’d hold my ground personally, they are that basic and fragile on the singular level for the highest per cent of people so long as they are activist who never stood a chance and are desperate to be something better. Which they deserve mostly – but those who ruined their prospects then shafted them with yet again with a woke mind F! Talk about take the P.

   Thus while there would be strong pockets of a more inform source of emergence, on the whole the foot soldiers will not have any idea how this psychological system ( lets say its on that level in singular terms ) – transforms into viral sociological contagion. As other have pointed out, this does not make them idiots. Though still not advisable, – ‘Stupid’ – sort of sums soldiers up if used strictly non ad hominem,
   Except ‘Stupid’ is one of those anomalies so misused so long that it causes instant offence & invites nonsensical responses.

   As a tentative remark. The contagion has a synthetic form of Ai capability strict as the term ‘artificial intelligence’ is quite self explanatory. Except there is a subculture out there that is suspicious, with its claims that to talk Ai is = consciousness in machines. So much so that this also seems like a supplementary manipulation. ‘AI’ already states its artificial in its own description. Many seem to be ignoring that where Ai becomes a matter of consciousness. In another post sometime i could state how a trans humanist element has been exploited for woke & gender politics. However it is fair to say that a computer must prove emotional intelligence to prove intelligence at all, since everything else can fake by a malicious database. That sort of evidence is hundreds of years away. The ability for machines to complete tasks human instructed them to is not Ai. But there are signs that far emotional intelligence is being put into sociological practice also.

   I am a Uk poster. Often my terms & the feel in my turns of phrase will be aligned to the Uk impact with these matters.

   Reply

2. Along with mistaking wokes for “idiots” and pretending that malice is only stupidity (it’s not!), there are four other huge mistakes/underestimations “conservatives” make about woke/left people. (This comment is really long – thank you for allowing me my say.)

   One: Blue haired gender studies grads are so useless they can’t even get jobs at McDonalds. WRONG. These grads are the indoctrinated foot soldiers of the woke/left ruling class and get hired immediately at tens of thousands of government-funded NGOs, community programs, schools, media, the arts, and so on. They are a woke army who is being created for their functionary roles.

   ALL are fully employed at huge salaries because they are rigidly-trained lackeys who are rewarded with status and money for their fanatical obedience to their paymasters’ (ruling class) dogmas and dictates.

   Scan this random list from a progressive social services employment web site (I randomly selected NYC as search locale). All of these jobs hire blue haired woke gender studies grads only (and no white men ever unless they pretend to be a “woman”!)

   https://charityvillage.com/search/#results/63234b9e170f72ffa38dc761?kw=&loc=New+York+City%2C+New+York%2C+United+States&place_id=5128581&city=New+York+City&page_num=1

   Two: Sensible and ordinary middle class people will not continue to vote for or agree with left policies and woke insanity indefinitely. WRONG. The majority of the new middle class in the Western world work for the government and obey ruling class leftist directives to retain their status and money. Joel Kotkin: “…much of LA’s remaining middle class [in 2022] is made up of teachers and other public employees.”

   The former merchant, business and blue-collar urban middle class in USA/Canada is now made up almost entirely of government-paid public servants (bureaucrats, consultants, education, arts, etc.) The new urban bourgeoisie no longer work for themselves or for blue-collar industry or for small/large businesses, but solely as apparatchiks for the ruling class (and woke is their dogma of the moment).

   https://www.spiked-online.com/2022/09/10/the-fall-of-los-angeles/

   Three: Hivemind Minority versus Individualist Majority. Woke-left people comprise a minority Swarm. Anti-woke people comprise a majority of dissenting Singletons who are individually separated, disconnected, leaderless, and rendered impotent by their lack of conceptual cohesion, infighting, failure to have each others’ backs, and the betrayal of their interests by their own vindictive and traitorous womenfolk.

   For example, how can .01% of the human population, i.e. Trans, control the entire society with online bullying and death threats? Because Trans are part of a woke-left Swarm. Solitary Trans are defenseless and unable to defeat anti-wokes one on one (except by psychopathic murder). So they use social media as their “Swarm pheromones” to signal to one another an alert to mob attack (take down) the anti-woke individual who didn’t bow down to one of their members.

   My conservative 29-year-old nephew told me he plans to wear an anti-woke t-shirt in public then confront any wokes who hassle him. I said, bad move. You will lose. Because after the event, you will be alone with no one to back you up even if all your pals online say they’re gonna kick woke ass, they won’t because the cops will turn on them every single time and ruling class conformity enforcers such as “Human Rights” tribunals and mainstream and social media will separate you from the flock and crucify you on the cross of woke.

   Woke/lefts are like wasps. A single wasp keeps bugging you until you get exasperated and kill it. As it dies, it seems to send a signal of “Swarm pheromones” that alerts other wasps who swarm and attack the person who killed the solitary wasp. Wokes are wasps. Individual anti-wokes cannot ever defeat the Swarm because it is programmed to isolate, pile on and mob the defenseless and isolated anti-woke individual.

   John Burnham in ‘The Machiavellians’ described the mechanisms of minority control of majorities very clearly in 1943. (I can’t find exact passages on the fly.)

   https://archive.org/details/BurnhamJamesTheMachiavellians/page/n3/mode/2up

   Four: Failure to recognize that woke versus anti-woke is an Assymetical Battle: Pluralism and Leave Me Alone (anti-wokes) versus Borg Assimilation and Extermination (wokes). Anti-wokes (especially “conservatives” and “Christians”) refuse to accept that wokes are not playing the same fair-play game as anti-wokes. Anti-wokes assume the culture wars are like a football game with opposing players playing the same game abiding by the same rules but just on opposing “sides”. WRONG. This is the biggest mistake “conservatives” make. Wokes are not playing your game from the past: They are playing their own game while knowing that you’re not even aware that the old game (fair play) has been changed to the new game (by all means necessary). “Nice” is suicide.

   Lack of understanding of woke Swarm reality (foolishly calling them idiots or unemployable, etc) as well as ignorance or refusal to accept that the prime directive of all wokes is total war: This is why anti-wokes are losing the battle. This reality is bleak and black-pill and ugly and overwhelming, but pretending otherwise is a one way ticket to the extinction of generations of Western personal freedoms.

   A Total War reconceptualization of this historical moment is desperately needed across many fronts, especially the recognition that anti-woke dissidents are a complex and diverse collection of disparate groups and individuals and not merely “conservatives” or “Christians”. There must be a shared intention to align the collective wills of all who want to remain free, no matter how different they are from one another.

   There’s no other way because this time there’s not going to be any Custer’s Cavalry or returned Jesus or restored “Democracy” to save our anti-woke asses.

   Reply

   1. “The Lumpenbourgeoisie: The Price We Pay For Elite Overproduction
      by Leighton Woodhouse

      But probably no industry has scooped up more of this labor market overflow than the non-profit sector. Unlike in tech and media, in the world of progressive NGOs, there is an actual organic demand for the moral capital that these job applicants have spent four years of college accumulating. There, one’s finely calibrated sensitivity to microaggressions, one’s native fluency in the obscure grammar and lexicon of social justice speak, and one’s acute ability to discern the structures of racism in literally anything are assets rather than liabilities.

      And from there, one can literally create the consumer market for those talents out of thin air, simply by inventing new social problems to solve.

      From the perch of one’s non-profit post, one can diagnose the rest of the world’s afflictions, perceiving the white supremacy at work in corporation X’s failure to achieve racial parity in its recruitment practices, and recognizing the misogyny and transphobia in the gender lopsidedness of industry Y’s consumer base. One can divine the contours of new marginalized communities, from “voice-hearers” to “MAPs,” each desperate for new 501(c)(3)s to protect them from their oppressors.

      Defense against social exclusion, it turns out, is an infinitely elastic commodity, as it takes nothing more than a college-educated imagination to discover new threats, name new villains, and then sell your remedial services to the wrongdoers in the form of audits, trainings and consultations.

      The business model is simple: extortion. The non-profit world’s moral technicians scan the landscape for organizations, whether public or private, that can afford their services, diagnose them as acutely infected by some form of structural oppression or another, and then offer up their suite of services to set them on their public path to healing and redemption. As Malcom Kyeyune has noted, the ideology of wokeness operates like a political protection racket, insinuating its practitioners into every industry and enterprise as intermediaries between creators and their creations.

      You can run your company, you can write your screenplay, you can draft your bill, you can bring your product to market — but not without bringing in an outside team of minders to ensure that it conforms to the ideological standards of the moral intelligentsia, for a hefty fee. For a class devoid of any discernible skills of actual economic value, this parasitical function is an enviable source of political and social power.”

      https://leightonwoodhouse.substack.com/p/the-lumpenbourgeoisie?s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

      Reply

3. “Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution. To bring on this reformation requires that the organizer work inside the system…”

   “…[A]ll values and factors are relative, fluid, and changing… The elements will shift and move together just like the changing pattern in a turning kaleidoscope.”

   “Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins—or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom—Lucifer.”

   ‘Rules For Radicals: A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals’
   Saul D. Alinsky, 1971

   Reply